Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 22
Page 4
4 / 4
FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95)
279A-WF-222936-USAMRIID
Continuation of FD-302 of
Bruce Edwards Ivins
,On 03/31/2005 ,Page
b6
any contamination would most likely have occurred along the same
b7C
path
ette
took. Ivins also reported that he had no concerns
about
competency as a
land his decision to.
Swab
work area was not influenced by any perception that
was negligent in.
safety practices.
Ivins was also questioned concerning information he
concerning his unilateral decision to collect environmental samples
(swabs) from areas associated with Suite B3 in Building 1425 in
April 2oo2. Ivins advised that he made the decision to
unilaterally swab areas associated with Syite B3 when he learned
that USAMRIID researcher
had recently conducted an.
environmental sampling of the B3 lab which produced several.
presumptive positives for Bacillus anthracis.
reportedly
undertook this sampling effort in response to a suspected spill
which occurred durinq an experiment being conducted by researchers.
As a precautionary measure, nasal
swabs were taken from
In addition to the possible spill and.
nasal swab, Ivins also recalled that Suite B3 is where he
had conducted plating and colony counts on the Daschle letter.
Consequently, he suspected that stray spores may have aerosolized
during that effort.
Ivins advised that the December 2001 and April 2002
environmental samplings represent the only two times he has ever
swabbed in the cold areas of usAmRiiD outside of the hot suites.
Ivins related that during the early l99os he performed a lot of
swabbing inside the hot suites as part of usAmRIiD's routine
environmental monitoring program. He conducted this sampling at
the direction of his superiors. These samples were collected as a
routine safety precaution and, unlike his December 2ool and April
2002 collections, were not performed in response to a specific
concern or suspected contamination. IviNs has since been excluded
from the task of any such monitoring.
IvIns reported that no isolates related to his December.
200l or April 2002 swabbing initiatives remain in existence. IvINS
eagngaod aaradunaaad aee bugugeaeo naaee Aeme waea maaea ay peee
results.
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic