Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 04
Page 16
16 / 16
Chicago Sun-Tirnes, Thursday, November 15, 1979
05
Panther lawyers hit judge's letters
By James Warren.
For example, in an April 23, 1976, letter marked "confiden
tial," Perry responded to a request by Kocoras for information
. Citing newly released aocuments, Black Panther lawyers
concerning the conduct of the lawyers and several Federal Bu-
Wednesday charged that improper correspondence between
reau of Investigation agents.
the trial judge and top federal olficials suggest an early at-
The judge concluded that thie lawyers and agents "have re-
-tempt to "whitewash" 'their celebrated case.
presented all of the present and former FBi agents and the
In a motion filed in U.s. Court of Appea!s, the lawyers seek
former informant for the FBI in the highest tradition of the
" a new hearing on allegations that the gdvernment hid key evi-
Bar. They are to be commended for their conduct in a most
dence and esk for disciplinary measures against U.S. District
difficult case."
Court Senior Judge Joseph Sam Perry.
The same day,Perry sent another letter marked "confiden-
Last April, a three-member appeals panel reinstated the
tial' to Levi. He enclosed his letter to Kocoras and again con-
ciuded that the lawyers and agents "should be commpiimented
Fowng
multimillion-dollar civil suit against former Cook County
State's Atly. Edward V.Hanrahan and others, including the
for their standard.of conduct in the case."
FBI, who conducted the 1969 raid in which Panthers Fred
The Panther lawyers' motion states: "These faise and glow-
Hampton and Mark Clark were killed.
ing determinations of the good faith of the defendants and
During the originai trial the Panther lawyers had moved for
their attorneys were, of course, precisely what he ultimately
a mistrial, citing massive withholding of evidence. Perry
ruled a year later os the motion for sanctions, which. was
turned then down but said he would consider the matter at
pending before him when he wrote these letters.'
trial's end.
Perry declined comment, and Levy, Kocoras and Skinner
The new documents,procured under Freedom of Informa-
could not be reached.
tion Act requests, indicate that while that issue was pending,
' correspondence took place between Perry, then-U.s. Atty.
.Gen.Edward H. Levi and Charles P.Kocoras top assistant to
.then-U.S. Atty. Samuel K. Skinner.
The letters reveal that a year hefore he actually ruled, Perry
essentially told Levi, Skinner and Kocoras-the officials asked
to investigate charges of improper conduct by government
lawyers-that he would rule in their favor.
4450 3-A4o6
SEARCHTD
INDEXED
SERIALEDS5ZL
(0:1 179
FI-CHCAGO
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic