Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
john-lilly — Part 01
Page 22
22 / 23
Tolson
PTIONAL FORM NO 10
UNITED STATES GOV
MENT
Belmon
Memorandum
Calgha
McGure
TO
Mr. DeLoachw
DATE 7-12-60
Trotter
WC Sullivan
Tele Roon
FROM
SUBJECT
DR. JOHN C. LILLY, DIRECTOR
COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Remy memo 7-8-60 and radiogram to San Juan to interview Dr. Lilly and
deter
mine sourse of his information. Dr. Lilly not be advised of the results of our interview
sible. 7-9-60 radfdgram from San Juan reflected that Dr. Lilly had departed the Virgin
Islands on 6-26-60 leaving a forwarding address in Miami, Florida, and requested Miami
to handle.
At 9 a.m. on the morning of July 11, SA
Crime Research Section,
received a telephone call from Dr. Lilly as to the status of our inquiries. Dr. Lilly was
contacted by Agents of our Miami Office..
b7C
The Director noted regarding the Jones to DeLoach memo of 7-8-60: "This.
I don't understand. Mitchell looks like the culprit & I see no reason for shielding him. H".
Mr. Hoover's comments were received in the Crime Research Section at 12:07 p. m. on
I July 11.
At approximately 12 noon on 7-11-60, Dr. Lilly again called the Bureau.
and requested to speak to.
Later in the afternoon of July 11, Krant returned Lilly's.
call. Lilly advised that two Agents of the Miami Office had visited him. The Agents had
informed him the FBI had thoroughly investigated his allegations and determined they were
without foundation. Dr. Lilly then complained that the Agents insisted he identify the soutce
of his information regarding the alleged mistake by the FBI. He also stated the Ag nts told
I him our files would reflect his refusal to cooperate if he failed to name his source.
Lilly was told by
in no'certain terms that at this point we wep.
thoroughly disappointed in him. On the basis of his allegations we had conducted a-thorough
and exhaustive inquiry. We felt it was his duty and obligation at this point to give us the
name of his informant regarding these aspersions on our name. Lilly said he could not do
this as he had given his word to the person who had furnished the information that he would
not disclose it. Lilly was told we could notaccept this excuse inasmuch as we now were.
determined that the true facts be known to Defense officials involved in granting clearances.
(As you know, we have informed George Gould, Office of the Secretary of Defense,of our
Enclosure
investigation of these allegations and of our determination ngt to be.
1 - Mr. Ingram
/-
REC- 79
1 - Mr. Belmont (Attention Name Check Section).
1 - Liaison Section
1O JUL 2O 1J09
CRIME RESEARO
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic