◆ SpookStack

To: Detroit From Los Angeles U Re: 9A-LA-237335, 09/30/2004 Section 875(c) - Threatening Interstate Communications (punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment). However, such cases are not usually charged after only one offense in the Central District of California unless mitigating circumstances exist to indicate that the subject represents a viable threat. The usao advised that they would consider charging at this time if the FBI felt he was likely to carry out his threats, or was b6 likely to make further threats. The usAo advised that they would b7C definitely seek charges against. if he in fact sends any further threats. Detroit is therefore requested to locate and interview If possible, a confession or admission to sending the e-mail should be obtained. In particular, Detroit should attempt to elicit from an admission that he intended to threaten Anna Nicole. Smit b6 and get him-to-name-the- attorney, - if possible? In the absence of a complete confession, admission'that the above b7C user name is his would be useful. The Usao would also like Detroit to attempt obtain consent to search house and computer, and if possible have print any saved e-. mails he may have sent to Smith.. If is cooperative, appears genuinely contrite, Detroit is requested to strongly admonish him that sending. b6 threatening e-mails is a federal felony, and advise him that any b7C future threatening e-mails to any recipient will result in his indictment and arrest.. If is uncooperative, hostile or threatening, Detroit should advise Los Angeles, and charges will be pursued in the Central District of California. Prior to interviewing Detroit is requested to contact he PpD and obtain any available information regarding their previous investigation of and contact with If the b6 PPD regards as a threat to safety, either of Smith or his b7C ex-wife, Los Angeles will consider pursuing charges. Finally, Detroit should consider interviewing ex-wife for a further assessment of the threat he poses. 2