Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
9-11 Commission Report — Part 34
Page 20
20 / 23
To:
Counterterrorism From:
Berlin
Re:
315n-wF-227135, 12/05/2003
Defense attorney Pinar now asked that Fromm's testimony be.
cited in the final verdict.
Chief Judge Ruhle informed Pinar that it would be noted:
Defense attorney Pinar then asked.Fromm if he could
eyn yo saaqene ayn neyg Auoennann sny Aq nueae pey ay neyr ugendxe
Hamburg Group became ever more radical in their perspective.
Fromm advised that he had already explained' this to the
fanatical Muslims that they later became to be. They had decided in
J! 'ygeap aya on aybtg pue nem Agoh e ut laed aye7 07 666t Io 866t
necessary.
Defense attorney Pinar then asked whether it was a
necessary element of their radical development to travel to
Afghanistan.
Fromm answered that it was not a necessary aspect of
radical Islamic development..
She also asked whether Islamic radicals go to Afghanistan
to participate in a "Jihad." Fromm advised that those radicals could
also go to Chechnya and Bosnia to participate in a "Jihad.i.
Defense attorney Pinar asked how Fromm was able to
information was derived from the results of statements given by
detained Mujahadeen. The information was also derived from "open"
sources of information and information shared with the Bfv by other
intelligence agencies.
Fromm could not answer the question any.
further.
Prosecutor Dr. Krauf next asked Fromm if he was aware that
flight simulator computer programs had been discovered. on
Motassadeq's computer, and that these programs had existed on his.
computer prior to 1999. Fromm testified that this information was
not known to him. If this were true, then such information would
have been known by the experts at the Bfv. Nonetheless, Fromm did
not consider this information as relevant, since it would not have
altered the final conclusion issued by the Bfv..
Chief Prosecutor Walter Hemberger then asked Fromm if he
had understood Fromm's testimony correctly. Namely, the Bfv's
conclusion that there was no previous intention to commit the acts of
September 11th was based upon the absence of preparations for
executing the plan, such as undertaking flight training.
Fromm
answered that it could not be viewed in such a strict manner.
12
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic