Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 01
Page 14
14 / 42
UNCLASSIFIED
To:
San Diego
From: San Diego
Re:
SD 205-0, 02/17/2011
asking that the NN Council override
veto of Resolution
b6
No. CO-42-10.
any yote from any council delegate and that the council demanded
provide proof of his accusation at the recqrded 11/10/2010
meeting (Tab A-4).
was unable to provide any proof. *The
NNERO notified
in'a memorandum dated 11/20/2010, that they
would not initiate
an investigation of the allegation because
could not. provide substantive information relative to the
person's name and whether the person was a NN elected official
employee (Tab A-5). On 11/22/2010, the NNER0 also notified
in a memorandum that they would not investigate his allegation
6).
In a faxed letter dated 12/17/2010
consultant and former
advised
that' he had
spoken to several members of the NN qovernment and some council
delegates to learn that no one took
seriously when he made
the public bribery allegation.
also informed that during
NNERO interview,
laimed he was approached by a man
he had never seen before and could not identify by name when
offered a campaign donation to vote green.
stated that the
NN was not planning to file any charges against'Sempra (Tab A-7).
On 12/18/2010,
provided a signed declaration.
(Tab A-8., document retained by
On 12/22/2010, the
NNERo formally notified Sempra by way of a
letter addressed to
that they had interviewed.
and without further
intormation, would not be able to investiqate the bribery
allegation (Tab A-9). In conclusion,
sent a letter to
dated 12/30/2010, stating that s
emora
was surprised to learn
allegation, asked why
did not report the alleged.
bqtxe
it supposedly occurred in September, and requested
that
send details of the allegation to Sempra in writing..
had not yet responded to this request as of 02/17/2011.
advised that Sempra hired
of
and
in Arizona to conduct an independent review or the
ion which was still ongoing. The DoJ requested that
inquire with
as to why the investigation had not
been closed based upon tne outcome of the NNero probe..
The second matter presented addressed concerns.
surrounding transactions associated with a fire station. given by
Sempra as a charitable donation to the City of Tijuana.
UNCLASSIFIED
3
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic