Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 01
Page 9
9 / 42
UNCLASSIFIED
To:
San Diego
From:
San Diego
Re:
SD 205-0, 02/10/2011
In the 3.5 years following this transaction until
was laidoff,
never voiced concerns about this
transaction to anyone within the company. Sempra.
has
code pf
conduct and a stand-alone FcpA compliance policy.
signed Sarbanes-Oxley certifications and FcpA certifications
every year
reported this incident as a possible FcPA
violation.
held quarterly meetings with.
a
Sempra in-house attorney responsibi.
FcpA compIiance, as part
b6
of a Mexican
litigation review.
never once voiced any.
b7C
concerns to
regarding potential FcpA violations..
never raised any
concerns about FcpA violations at his reguiar.
Controller meetings, which were attended by approximately 12
individuals.
Not until
received notice that he would be
laid off from the Company did he ask a question about the cash
b6
b7C
transaction that had occurred in Mexico with regard to the bond.
At that time,
asked a subordinate to email company.
documents to
his persohal email account regarding the.
transaction.
on-going complaint against the Company has.
evolved from a wrongful termination suit with regard to age
discrimination, to an allegation that a corporate structure built.
in Ensenada, Casa Azul, was paid for with rate payer money, to an
allegation of bribing a foreigp..
official.
Sempra's first contact.
with al
attorney after
was laid off stated that
was entitled to some monetar
relief, but made no
b6
mention of FcpA violations.
has had three different
b7C
attorneys to date in his on-going complaint against. the Company..
In summary.
internal investigation concluded.
that
is a disgruntied ex-employee who wants to extract.
money
rrom tne Company by whatever means necessary, and that the
allegations of an FcpA violation are without merit. The cash was.
used toward the legitimate posting of a bond with the Ensenada.
AG's office and was not a bribe. All documents provided by
are maintained in-the 1A section-of-the-zero- file..
did not conduct any interviews of individuals
within the Ensenada Ag's office, primarily due to safety
concerns.
complaint did not name the person within.
the Ag's ofrice who was bribed and furthermore
works at the AG's office.
is known to
associate with cartel members and
lattorney, who
represents many cartel members, is known as "El Diablo."
UNCLASSIFIED
4
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic