◆ SpookStack

? N. Viner otov, “Hypa the Acura vob Pecception of 4 No 3, lye], pp 30-31 (Conclusion, sxdon ata Dastange ht, For began § see Bos. 1 and 2) 7. "Does the ‘psi’ phenomenon exist?": L. L, Vasil'yev, “What Is Para- psychology?"; L. G, Voronin, "Telepathy Is Not a Scientific Problem."; A. $. = Presman, "Telepathic Occurrences, of Course, Do Take Place."; I, Aj Yefremev, "No Mysticism Is Involved Here." == Nedelya, No 48, 25 November - 1 December 1952 od. "'Mysterious' Phenomenon: Discovery or False Alarm?": L. Voronin et al,, "Once More on ‘Rose Kuleshova's Effect '"; V, Timakov, "The Responsi- bility of a Scientist."; K. Ivens, “Mediums Yield ° “Their Position." -- Litera- turnaya Gezeta, 29 July. 1970, p 12. ! 9. “Telepathy: For and Against (A Selection). The Discussion Contin- ues.": F, Zigai', "Telepathy, the Science of the Future."; D. Biryukov, "Tele- pathy Cannot Be Considered a Science."; Ye, Faddeyev,' "Why Repeat Old Mistakes." - Messing, "I Am For Experiments with a Capital E."; M. Vasil'yev, "Things Should Be Measured and Weighed."; A. Kitaygorodskiy, ‘Now They Call It Para- psychology..."'; L. Filippov, "Reflections on Method."s-I, Kogan, "Is It Pos- sible or Impossible?"; Ye. Parnov, "Neutrino? And Why Not!"y M.S. Smirnov, “I Believe That Physics Is Changing."; P. A. Rebinder, "To Move Ahead Means to Investigate."; L, Sukharebskfy, | psychology but Biological Informa. tion."; E, Naunov; “Resources_of the _Brain,"; S. Gellershteyn, “Curiosity Should Not Be Confined,,,.''! -- Nauka i Religiya, No 3,:1966. - _ 10. “What-Is Man Capable of?" (A Selection)": V. Raykov, "Reincar! ation — Under Hypnosis."; Yu. Kamenskiy, "Let There Be Light."; P. Filippov, "From the Standpoint of Yesterday,"; E, Naumov & R. Fesenko; "The Subject of Our _ Work."; V. Klyachko, “The Efficiency Factor of Our Brain. "== Nauka i Religiy, No 9, 1966. ll. [No text]