◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs

312 pages · May 15, 2026 · Broad topic: War & Geopolitics · Topic: Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs · 5 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
amounts of U.S. air power over a considerable period of time would have given the necessary cover to permit a retreat into the Escambray. It was the President's opinion that the operation was doomed to defeat and the fact that an air strike was not forthcoming at a particular hour. or day probably hastened the defeat but would not have made the difference between success and failure. 12/* Secretary Rusk, with the President, was the other individual most responsible for the political alterations that ruled out implementation of the Agency's Trinidad Plan--which was favored at all times by the Joint Chiefs of Staff--and for cancellation of the D-Day air strike. As indicated in the discussion of his testimony before the Taylor Committee, Rusk found no fault with his own performance, but his dissimulative remarks about the judgments and performance of others not only shaded the truth but were demonstrably in error. As with Rebert Kennedy, Secretary Rusk would subsequently continue to provide dis- in~~Tm~tion about the Agency's estimates and the importance of the air operations. Secretary of Defense McNamara's opinions could have had a significant impact on the planning of the anti-Castro operation, particularly if he had studied the two JCSM's which seem to have disappeared from sight after having been sent to his office.~~ ~Questions regarding the importance of the cancelled air strike on D-Day were ones about which the Attorney General would continue to be most protective of the President--even to the point of dis- ingenuousness. This topic is discussed in detail in Volume I of this history (pp. 295-305). **The papers were JCSM-44-6l, 27 Jan 61, "US Plan of Action in Cuba," and JCSM-166-t51, 15 Mar 61, "Evaluation of the Mil i tary Aspects of AlternAte Concepts, CIA paramilitary Plan, Cuba." 245
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 252
Jump straight to page 252 of 312.
Reader
Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the War & Geopolitics archive hub and the more specific Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
pigs operation soviet control induce
Related subtopics
SOVIET PROPAGANDA ACTIVITIES IN CUBA
2 documents · 1184 known pages
Subtopic
1P Ee
1 documents · 3 known pages
Subtopic
Subtopic
Cia'S Anti-Castro Policies
1 documents · 408 known pages
Subtopic