◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

BayOfPigsVolumeIVTheTaylorCommitteeInvestigationOfTheBayOfPigs

312 pages · May 15, 2026 · Broad topic: War & Geopolitics · Topic: Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs · 5 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Once again it appears that two members of the Taylor Committee should have been able to respond to the comments of one of the witnesses. In this instance, presumably the Director of Central Intelligence (PCI} had received a copy of the. JCSM-l66-6·l--at least one of the recommendations of the Joint Chiefs was that the Secretary of Defense forward a copy of the memorandum to the DCI. As a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Arleigh Burke, too, should have reviewed the memorandum if, in fact, he did not receive his . 62/ own copy. In another of the protective stances that he adopted in support of administration policy, Mr. Bundy stated: I do not concur in any judgment that this operation was "run from the White House." What happened was rather that as trouble began to develop after D-Day, the.re was steady pressure on the President ~or a relaxation of rules which had pre- viously been made, and in the light of changing circumstances some such re- laxations were authorized. Only in the case of the decision on Sunday with respect to the D-Day strike was there an operational modification that re- stricted, instead of enlarging, the authorizations to the CIA. 63/ In the context presented, Mr. Bundy's remarks made it appear - as if the cancellation of the D-Day strike was a relatively insignificant ~atter--in fact it unhinged the whole operation. Moreover, l-1r. Bundy ignored the significant actions between D-2 and D-Day when re-attack on Castro's air fields was rejected and s~gnificant modifications of the D-Day target 73 -flo'
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 80
Jump straight to page 80 of 312.
Reader
Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the War & Geopolitics archive hub and the more specific Bayofpigsvolumeivthetaylorcommitteeinvestigationofthebayofpigs topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
pigs operation soviet control induce
Related subtopics
SOVIET PROPAGANDA ACTIVITIES IN CUBA
2 documents · 1184 known pages
Subtopic
1P Ee
1 documents · 3 known pages
Subtopic
Subtopic
Cia'S Anti-Castro Policies
1 documents · 408 known pages
Subtopic