Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Adrian Lamo — Part 3
Page 240
240 / 501
Slashdot | Adrian Lamo CharggdaW ith Hacking e@ Page 19 of 33
AGWo Gt HIG, RIO LEBEL UY UE BAe Gv ULag WY & KUNAIPEULy 2 ULL LeU. GU KOE
only is this service uninvited and not approved, it gives access to private
company resources and information, and uses the security holes to get in.
Yes, I assume if security is the only dimension that your job entails, then this is
all worth it. But to most people in charge, and arguably the general populace at
large, this is an intrusion by illegal means.
I personally value my private virtual space. If you get on my computer and get
into my root account, it's an intrusion. Yeah, I will listen to how you did it, but
for your troubles you'll never use my computer again.
{ Reply to This | Parent]
» Wish Lhad mod points for once by jbarket (Score:2) Saturday September 06, @11:10AM
o Re: Wish I had mod points for once by williewang (Score:1) Saturday September
06, @11:33AM
© Lreply beneath your current threshold.
Re:hacking... (Score:5, Insightful)
by El Cubano (631386) on Saturday September 06, @11:35AM (#6887387)
I can realy understand how someone could consider that they've doing a service
for admins and all of that, but the point is that you are still breaking into a
system and then turning around and saying, “hey, this is a security hole, you
should fix it” is kind of like G. Guido coming down to your house, breaking in
through a window with a golf-club and then saying, "Hey, I can break into your
house, better listen to me or I'll do it again."
I'm sure that Adrian has some noble goals, but fundamentally when a company
decides that they don't like people creeping into their system and then presses
charages against those who do, it's their right to feel that their security was
violated. Good luck to him really, but there are other ways you can help people
protect their network security than by breaking into them.
I can see your point, but what he was doing was exposing flaws in the security of
"public" places on the net. How is this any different than when the local news
where I live broke into the nearby international airport's restricted area and did a
report from there (this was about a year after 9/11) to show how lax security had
become again.
When the journalists do it, it is a public service. When a private citizen does it, it
is a crime. WTF? Personally, if 1 am going to be utilizing the services of these
sites, I want to know that they have good security (and not just because they say
so).
There is no way anyone can convince me that what he was doing was wrong. He
was providing a public service, and if the public is too ungrateful to realize that,
then it is really sad.
It's not like he extorted money from the comapnies, or demanded some
compensation, heck he even helped them fix the holes. It is just sickening that
you can't even be a good Samaritan without someone wanting to take your head
off.
FBI(19-cv-1495)-1911
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/06/1325221 shtml?tid=123 &tid=126 &tid=172&tid=99 9/8/2003
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic