◆ SpookStack

i i In TSE : i . | E STATE OF i i! OF GEIROTA, i i Plaintiff } i i ) | ij Ws } . te # } Indictaent Ho. ap Sel PE pou Hf } res | Berendant. ) i & OPDER FESTRICTING EXTRA JUDICIAL STATEMENTS 2F THe FROSECUTION, COUNSEL Pox THR DEPERSE, FOTEWTIAL rade: WITNESSES, COURT FERSONNEL ae (MEMBERS OF TEE SPECIAL TASK FORCE InvesTic 3 THR TWenTy-f£ice? CHILD SLAYING Cases. 3° ie Baving noted through the news media the naned ef ivo potential | Prosecution witnesses as weli as statemcots asce by i ae a Oe thes regarding matters pertinent to the upcoming trial of i i j Wayne B. Williams, yhe Court, of itz own motion, hae weighed and of % | considered dts impact co the Defendant’ co oneeitutsonal right 4@ i { a fair asd dmpartia: trial, Since it is the trial judge's i responsibility to control presuéiedsi pretrial publicity and tue a fais trisi, che Covrt finda We ebasivtely 2 recarrence ef such poblicity by rez ct : t nedia by the Prosecution, Coursel for the ai cnasses, court peraghnel ang sexpera of Fasx Force; luding the Cemi id Director of tne Eureas cf Folice Services oF anyone affilieted wich law enforcement. Said restrictions are being imposed in Keering with the 0.8. Suprene Court rviings ia Sheppard Vv. marwell 38¢ 0.8. 333 a a | a6 Asssciation v. Stuart 427 5.5. 539 t . H ty, Maxweli, tne 0,5, Bupreme Coury fc ooised i ‘ cn the triel coyrt’s futy te pretest She Defendant's soz: a i t - | ticnal right te a fair triel, es follower hi i Due process requires that the ascused receive a by i i i impartial jury frze from outside influences. diver che be | pervasiveness cf modern i z fa