◆ SpookStack

PaGE TWO ATKID AFFIANT FOR AEOVE WANKANTS. DURING QUESTIONING BY DEFENSE COUN~ SEL MARY WELCOME, CHIEF REDDING WAS SPECIFICALLY ASKFD IN A SERIES OF INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS AS TO WHY SO MANY OF THE VICTIMS* NAMES WERE MENTIONED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. REDDING WAS COMMITTED TO REPLY THAT IT WAS THE DETERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION THAT HE In FACT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THOSE VICTIMS INNUMERATED THEREIN. THE ABOVE STATEMENT NOW MAKES A MATTER OF COURTROOM RECORD THE LAM ENFORCEMENT ASSUMPTION THAT THE SUBJECT, PLTHOUGH NOT CHARGED WITH NUMEROUS HOMICIDES, 1S CONSIDERED TO PE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THCSE WHEREIN FIBER EVIDENCE HAS BEEN OPTAINED. PRESIDING JUDGE CLARENCE COOPER WILL RULE ON TODAY'S MOTION MOST PROBABLY ON 18/21/81. ASSISTANT FULTON COUNTY DA NILLE® WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE IN A CONFERENCE WITH QMMMMBFe1 Lae, As To FEASIBILITY OF WORKING UP ALL OF THE FIBER EVIDENCE OBTAINED DURING THE ENTIRE INVESTIGATION AND CURRENTLY ON DEPOSIT AT THE GEORGIA CRIME LAB. MILLER INDICATES THAT UNDER STATE LAW, IT 1S POSSIBLE TO SHOW SIMILAR AND COMMON PATTERNS OF BEHAVIOR WHICH INDICATE A SCHEME BIC. Py