Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00792r000300330001 8
Page 5
5 / 99
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300330001-8
LN734-85
bitter struggle. I believe, that facing such a major problem, that we are
better off to imagine that it is going to be difficult than to believe it is
going to be easy, be simple. Do you comrades agree with me? This is the first
problem. a
The next question is that we must be very serious and thorough in our work,
very scientific. T have “heard that just recently tang Yu has lost his special
abilities. This is one example. It illustrates that we should record everything
very scientifically. Like this child Tang Yu. It seems that some things like
his process of development, his age, specific circumstances, were not recorded.
There is no proper record. For another example, like Qigong cure for some
diseases. There are lots of rumors to this effect, so it makes people feel that
there must be something worthwhile looking into. .However, are each of the case
records in compliance with modern medical standards? Are the records complete?
I have made this suggestion before in the past: In cases where Qigong has
effected cures, the medical history must be recorded according to standards
generally recognized by modern medicine. If we should actually have such a
treatise and cannot get it published in a medical journal in China, then we can
take it to a world-wide authoritative journal for publication. They will not
argue or make fun of us. If the author signs his name and swears that it is
true, and they see that it is in accordance with recognized medical standards,
they will publish it. Ou: work nm must be up to generally acceptable standards.
This is one the conditions « of “science. ‘An article published which meets
these requirements, which is the result of a scientific experiment, may serve
as a reliable case history. I want everyone to talk this over and see if this
isn't the way this should be done. This is my reasoning: A physicist carries
out an experiment, his subject is something dead. However, man is alive. He
is subject to all kinds of influences. Therefore, in these medical researches,
we have to look for the statistical records. Individual instances are not
enough. As for paranormal capabilities, these are active. This is subject
to even more influences. Therefore, we must carry out our observation very
scientifically, use scientific methods, have complete data. It is because of
this that we say we must study very carefully I how to improve our work in the
future. Th _is The second ques: tion.
question. I feel that we me way to improve organiza—
academic exchanges. “At the on Qigong held at Qing
only attended a few hours of meetings. I did not attend in
the afternoon or the next day. I believe the exchanges are lacking in depth. We
should have more exchanges, not a couple of days every six months. Shouldn't
we have more of them, and for a single sitting - morning or afternoon, at the
most an additional evening. At present, none of us is specializing in this kind
of research as a profession. We are doing it in addition to our other profession.
So it is difficult for everyone to get together for two continuous days of
meetings. So ) wouldn't it be better to have more academic exchanges, and exchange
‘in a little mor pth?
ae eee
df
-4-
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300330001-8
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic