Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bertolt Brecht — Part 3
Page 47
47 / 90
DIRECTOR, FBI July 17, 1952.
leanings. The informant advised that
has indicated that BRECHT was the thirteenth smong the top
Hollywood Communists investigated the House Unamerican
Activities Committee. has further
° stated that while the play has no open Communist features
it does tend to be strongly socialistic and for this reason
the film has never been produced comzercially either as a
stage play or as a movie in thie country, although it is
considered by the drama critics to be an outstanding work
of art. The film in question is the only known production
of this work and was made in Germany sotetime in 1949 and
1933.
The informant advised that has expressed -
some doubt as to the validity to 6 statements
since originally stated in a long distance call fron
Chicago to that Warner Brothers was involved in sone
litigation and could prove their point only by ence con—
t d_in this particular copy of this fil:
reported that subsequently when personally
interviewed him in Urbana concerning the fiim no mention was
ee of a litigation referred to in the telephone conversation.
>
a
reportedly told @gPthat the special character-
istics in this particular copy of the film were extra words
®dubbed in® to th und tract, which taken separately mean
nothing but when considered as a group comprise some sort cf
secret message. @MMMENB inferred that this film had been —
uged in some sort of international espionage situation many
years ago. He did not specify what the exact words were or
how Warner Brothers became aware of the changes, but stated
that because of these changes 1t was company policy to "*never*®
loan that film out.
The informant who is generally familiar with subversive and
- Gisloyal activities among student and faculty personnel at
the University of Tilin vised that he knows of no such
activity by of the Speech Departasent.
The informant stated that the circumstances surrounding the
showing of baie film were that because of the art val
. the fi was desirous of securing a co
.. th§@ fllm for the festival of contemporary arts in 1
helG at the University, but inasmuch as she vas unable *
seoure the copy in time for the festival a separate showin
of this fils was arranged under the auspiceses of the Speech
Departaent at the University.
-2- 2
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic