◆ SpookStack

. se if youwill consider that there is a very fine line h defines thoPe government has no right to interfere. Thet line is defined in preference to the First Amendment and not by any other considerationse | 3 PPS: “T enclese tio leaflets which ought to interest you | This school dges mt consider ne 2 friend. I aa forbidden to enter its campuse However, when I came out of the coms in October 1980 it was a BLACK preacher from this school whi: hed been regular ly visiting me in the hospital, That is sone discrininatig isn't it? He was the only preacher who regularly visited we and brought a Bible with him to read to me. . Would you please tell me who is to decide whet religious convictions j a person has a right to hold and practice? Did it ever occur to you that one's practice is inevitably the out- ons? ticed i ward reflection py action of their religious convi there is NO OTR WAY. .Any pelief is not a telief. 2 — . When did the Constitution ever permit a government body to decide what is the right of a person tO pelieve/practice? Did it ever occy to you that without the Lar of God there had never beensny basis for any law ho is just? All of the legal systens of history have refelcted God's lay to the direct degree in which God was avle to operate thru that govermnaente - Every govern— ment which rebelled against the Godly principles folded and it shall ever bee God never changes and He alone hes a STANDARD which is reliable end right. ly Friend, might I suggest that you get yourself a Bible and begin with 611 sericusness to find opt what lew is and how it is to be upheld? It can never originate in the mind nor wars cf Hane But every system of governrent is a direct .refaection of its religion- -religious convictionse Thst which you are reflecting is most vile. How then can it produce GOOD? woe You would continue the degeneration of lav and good government by your present course of actionse Sincerely azain ee |! ch is not pr