Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 2
Page 107
107 / 114
~~
- ALL INZORVATION CO pe
BEREIN 15 38 td
PURPOSE D iW py 5F Tipise [as
df
C fice Memorandum + onirep s..... GOVERNMENT
ce ~/
: EB ae i AN DATE: August 20, 1946 /
FROM RA, RosEN a WA Coal
SUBJECT: BENJAMIN *Bu08" SRG . e K iis
MISCELLANKOUS INFORMATION CONCERNING
CRIME SURVEY
This is to advise you that a hearing was held at San Francisco
on August 13 last concerning a "stop order" issued by the C.P.A.
Flaminco Hote as Vegas, Nevada.
as appointed to hear the subject
5 S presented at this hearing decided in favor of the re~ £7
however, allowed the C.P.A. until September 5th to produce
and unless such evidence is presented, the case will then be
The Los Angeles Office recently advised that in connection with the
construction of the Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, a stop order was issued
by the C.P.A. aga: > Construction Company which had been employed
the plan followed in the cons on of th lamingo Hotel.
stated that he pointed out at the hearing that this plan lacked details bx
evation and he therefore questioned could proceed with the
‘building using only the plans of January 12th. urther advised that he
vised in the negative. ‘eported that at the hearing the respondents showed
that they had received a on April 16, 1946 from the C.P.a4. to the effect that
they mst stop construction if the construction was in violation of a freeze order
Placed at that time, The respondents further produced a letter directed to the
C.P.A. stating that the construction was proceeding on the plan of January 12th
and as the was started before March 26th, they were not violating any
further advised that the respondents produced testimony
9 spent over $700,000 and committed themselves to ebout
further advised that he was concerned with the operation of
t they failed to present any proof that the respondents were vio—
lating any order issued by the C.P.4. Therefore, from the facts presented he decided
in favor of the respondents, However, he allowed the C.P.A. until re oe es
Produce further evidence if desired, and unless the C.P.. ing,
the case will then be closed. . & SIP
BG SEP 9 hae Site prmorea “e- re yr
NOV 17 1964 —&
asked if the local ve: al required filing of detailed plans, and he was ad-
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
fbi
bureau
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic