◆ SpookStack

PAGE TWO - ; MENTIONED A PLAN OF MARCH TWENTY TWO, THEY MENTIONED THE PLAN OF JAN- UARY TWELVE WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE LETTER UNDER WHICH THEY GOT AUTHORIZATION. THEY MENTIONED THE SEL WEBB COMPANY IS ro"AyrHEy FOLLOWED PLAN SIX A, ALTHOUGH THEY PROCEEDED UNDER THE MARCH TWENTY TWO PLAN. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE WEBB COMPANY IS NOT TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE MARCH TWENTY TWO PLAN AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS TO HAVE THE WEBB REPRESENTATIVE TESTIFY THAT HE FOLLOWED THE PLAN OF JANUARY TWELVE AND NO OTHER. THE TESTIMONY WAS TO BE THAT THE BUILDING IS TO BE A HORSESHOE OPEN ON ONE END WITH NO DETERMINATION MADE AT THE TIME AS TO WHICH END WOULD BE THE OPEN END AND THE TESTIMONY WAS FURTHER TO BE THAT THERE WAS NO DEVIATION FROM THE PLAN OF JANUARY TWELVE, THERE WAS MENTION THAT ONEQQMMBBWROTE To THE DISTRICT MANAGER, WHO APPARENTLY WAS PRESENT -UNIDENTIFIED~, SAYING THAT HE HAD FIXED MATTERS WITH SENATOR ---------- “NAME NOT AUDIBLE-. THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING SUT No MENTION MADE OF ANY APPROACH TO HIM, HE STATED THEY ONLY HAD TO PROVE THERE WAS ONE BUILDING WHICH VAs STARTED BEFORE TH@ REGULATION WENT IN, THAT THE CPA GAVE THEM A bi LETTER ON WHICH THEY RELIED AND IT WAS FURTHER MENTIONED THAT THE ONLY THING THEY DIDNT COMPLY WITH WAS THE FILING OF A PLOT PLAN FOR MARCH TWENTY SEVEN. AT ONE TEN PM THE PARTIES LEFT FOR THE HEARING. AT FOUR TWENTY PM THE PARTIES REENTEREDQQRMMMMM SUITE AT WHICH TIME AN INDIVIDUAL LATER IDENTIFIED AS QAI co. SO CR tou) im THEY HaD 4 DECISION IN THEIR iT