◆ SpookStack

Date Foaisena 2/28 S€ TOL AS surce.: by, ber de: any GARVES a+ Governecat Court rece -+; te 22° SE RW SE «Orcerec Altes rete #4 eNCes.. Bote) ana brea.tas’ . @apenses provider gi experse of Gover omer” $/. ‘Se Jcry returnedc to jury race tor Zur tbe: Qe ts welr. . : Lunch previded by © &. Werdict: Disagreem 2. we Qi dered deferdaut ccatiated on Osi]. D.ferdant reaewid moticss for judga-nt of acquittal on Couats . 1 excd 2 of and.ctment Oste for kearits to be + fized. Briefe to te subm.ttec Court adjoursed ue The files af the United States Attorsey refiect Ghas, ; Amm-diately upon the tischarge of the Jj om March 1, 1056, 5 “She defendant rereved the action fer acquittal which be bad £3 fade and which wae denied wher the Covernneat rested ats br | Bate. Ho evidence var sdduced im behslf of the defense, The, Pay 4 motion was pot argued, but course! requested a post i @popement Of be arguesnt for 30 cays. : a ry oo rs Bubseqcent to the poutposenest ef argument ov the _ motion for acqrittsl, there vere ae gers: nte ip the esse @etil the filing of the Government's wriet eppositios tee aD et sction em June &, 1986. On October 17, 1958, defend 1leé 8 motion for @ismisssl of the indictment beceuse ZVI was wot afforded 8 reeds trial), together with the brief e@scompassing both this moties and the motsoo for acquittal Ww made at the close of the trial. - ety Oc Nevewber 19, 1053, Judge PORTENDYEE bead the oral argueen’ or the ections for I-dgnert of acquittal ene! oc Gani Rs the tndretment 3b the case Qk Ths cour? proceedingek record reflects that tbe ..\ 5 hearing on Geftencant s motion for dismissa) of the andichamat ... wet aeeitt an Sveedcr 19, 3958. ard that de. t-100 war . rese:ved on defergat’s @otion for a judzwert of acquattal. Toe court procerdings record Gur aor reflect ary further proceed py mubsequen: to Wo em'>.: 19 195s a” Tre United States attorpey © File container the we Ss abe bs et Edt tion af tne “New tk Stas Ledger," @ Mewprh New fer: de°3. meerie: Reespaper. An article ua‘.