◆ SpookStack

v. APSKR 2WILLaAS . JBM fae 20. “Late bse af:erciig ene cf the Jurors bao Ga" ot the trial cf ttw of -h -awspeicred matter Came 10t> wy eitace and proffer. 4 certain isfcrmation relative to what tke jery Rad c aercered during its @cliberations. “First cf ait, et are advised that the fina: wete of the jury was sever Ser eoaviction and £1. for acquitta:. Tre jurcr stated that im the beginning Ait was aizxs-to-sizx arid after several hourt wert to . " geven-to-five, Which it reasined threaughout the - Pemainéer of the jury's deliberations. AS stated Aa my Brevieus letter to you gated March 2, 3956, the Jeary was ont 56 beure, wolele woo * "The juror who came is to ser os, althongt be Rar | along with iz otiers veted for conviction, meverthe- - J’ Jees stated that sli 12 were quite seri y concerned With the fact Ghat the Gevernesat'’s favestigstion ia _ BO Wise pegrted pricr cash secumelations. Ja short, event of @ ehabt i whether or 6 eee all 3 eer Seied tnat ae é i %e ““difeturbed becaube the epecial Asent wrdertock wc exazitatico or iprestizetion to determine .piether or Bot the att worth statemeats were accurate is the sense that do isve tien of prier years was - ‘ | Cae ‘ek pit the cofeedaat, ;; gna’ hiseite bed Pate lable fn addition te ms tress set ferid in the worth statements. Jn * ether words the jurcrs felt that the net worth state~ - @ents migtt aot have include- all assets and eoesequently the dcabt they Bad @ec.Ud aot be resolved because th G:vernment failed to addu.e @ry evidence p< t- firenvta’ circumstances ist prior gears. "yr ath fatrusss + the spe-jal agent 21 sbould expressly be pram -d 4. thar this case Su- arvestic pated by Inte: ce. Fovenr and preserved t. the Uranc