◆ SpookStack

furnish on behalf of the builders of the Fiamingo Hotel a letter, sta e t that they could proceed with construction and that as a result of this letter these people have invested a large sum of money in this ot. That objection would be answered by showing that the statement bo made sf at the “permission” granted was based on the false representation! In so far es the objection that these individuals have invested a large sum of money is concerned, that can be ‘ answered by points: N "BUGS" SIEGEL has never engaged in honest toil and tha in so far as present information shows does not legitimately have available the large sum of money so far spent in the construction of the Flamingo Hotel. INDICATIONS OF GUILT WHICH ARE NOT EVIDENCE C.P.A. hearing at San Francisco discussed hx in the hotel room at the Saint Francis D ity that perjury had been committed before the C.P.A. Commissioner. ‘ore the C.P.A. heart: ugust 13 and 1h IEGEL was in = 52 touch wi O Bee i! could “get to” the Commissioner, who was to hear S matter. This wo appear to be unnecessary if SIEGEL and his associates had not violated the C.P.A. regula tions. Us isoussed ~ ap Een of 2 200 on 6 Flamin, uring his conversati tated, "We have a single- story building of lattice steel of approxima O square feet which b? houses the restaurant, bar kitchen and oasino. The oost of this is estimated + 0,000.00 exclusive of furnishings.” Later in the same conversation, eo "Then we have a three-story and penthouse hotel building, ro of 55,000 square feet of re-enforced concrete. That builaing is going to cost us approximately $770,000.00 without any furnishings". saeesqanequpeemereanengemeappenreenme