◆ SpookStack

PAGE THREE ; TWELVE, FORTY SIX. HE FELT THAT BOTH THESE CHANGES RESULTED IN A CONSERVATION OF MATERIALS AND THUS WAS NOT IN VIOLATION OF ANY CPA ORDER. HE RULED THAT THE PLOT PLAN DATED MARCH TWENTY Two—~ WAS THE QUOTE DEFINITIVE DOCUMENT AS TO SIZE, AND CONSTRUCTION WAS IN CLOSE CONFORMITY TO THIS PLAN UNQUOTE. HE STATED THAT WHILE THERE WAS TESTIMONY BYQRRBMMMBB AND OTHER WITNESSES FOR THE RESPONDENTS AT THE FIRST HEARING THAT THE PLAN OF JANUARY TWELVE WAS THE BASIC PLAN, HE FELT THERE WAS NO MATERIAL —~~ “DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO PLANS WHICH WOULD INFLUENCE His DECISION, THE FIRST DIFFERENCE BEING THAT THE MARCH TWENTY TWO = jc. PLANS WHICH WERE INTRODUCED BY THE GOVERNMENT ARE SMALLER AS _ TO SIZE. HE FELT THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF MISREPRESENTAT | ON > NOR HAVING BEEN URGED BY THE GOVERNMENT. QQNMDID Not TEsTiFy AND HE THOUG STATING TOMMMMMMMB THAT THEY WERE BUILDING ONE BUILDING WAS MERELY{ CONCLUSION. MMBALSO FELT THAT RESPONDENTS' TESTIMONY AT FIRST HEARING THAT TUNNELS j CONTINUED UNDER ENTIRE QUOTE HORSESHOE UNQUOTE WAS ONLY THE ( CONCLUSION OF THE WITNESSES AND THE IDEAS THAT THEY HAD GAINED FROM HAVING TALKED TO THE ARCHITECTS. HE FELT THEY WERE MATERIALLY es MISSTATING THE FACTS. HE STATED HE QUOTE TOSSED THE TUNNELS OUT ae TE IN MAKING THE DECISION, GIVING IT WEIGHT ONLY Gases. IN CONNECTION WITH OTHER EVIDENCE SHOWING A CONNECTION BETWEEN