Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 19
Page 58
58 / 98
|
)
~~)
Los Angeles, California oR¥ATION C
September 18, 1946 ALL IN?
HEREIN 1
Re: BENJAMIN "BUGS" SIEGEL
MISCELLANEOUS; INFORMATION CONCERNING;
CRIME SURVEY
At 9:50 a.m, on September 14, 1946 I spoke a
at the Bureau in the absence of Assistant Director ROSEN. I aske
if he had reviewed the San Francisco teletype of September 13, 1946 and he
said that he was aware that the Government had lost the case before the
C.P.A. Commissioner in San Francisco. I 8 question now
ia whether this matter can be re-opened Sn te that
perhaps the doctrine of res adjudicata would apply, but I told him that
I did not believe this since the proceedings before the Commissioner bre
are not legal proceedings and are subject to review by the courts.
I suggested, however, that this matter be discussed with the department,
I pointed out that according to the VARIETY newspaper a case in Seattle
had been handled by the Mhited gtates Attorney to se order
stopping the construction of a $100,000 theatre sked
what the details of this were and I said that because
VARIETY carried a very small article about 1: allelic: out
that it would probably be very difficult to es sh a case at this
point in view of the fact that the matter had been fully sired before a
C.P.A. Commissioner, I stated that undoubtedly it would be a difficult
case but that I could see no harm in at least conducting the investigation;
that possible fraud in connection with the Flamingo Hotel is the only
Federal violation that we have except the narcotic matter in Mexico,
which is not under our jurisdiction. I said that { would like the
Bureau's decision as soon as possible because the time element is important
since construction of the hotel is going forward and we may find ourselves
in the position of eventually going into court on this matter and having
the defendants state that the hotel is practically finished so why
should the government now try to stop them.
MEMO, BAC:
I tol that our principal purpose in desiring
to go ahead with 8 investigation is to stop the hotel, if possible,
and secondly to trace_b the money which has gone into the construction pre
of the hotel. I ‘=< = it would be necessary to conduct
an open investigation o. 8 matter because we can no longer investigate
discreetly; that we have conducted all of the discreet investigation 4 S
that is possible, and the matter is not/at the é
ious individuals beginning wit!
equested that I submit a memorandum to jureau con ng
:
3
t
4
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
fbi
bureau
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic