Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 30
Page 90
90 / 92
S|
ve
“GOVERNMEN
pate: September 26, 1947
I have had the three caliber .30 carbine cartridge
in connection with the above-entitlied case examined
dvises me that the firing pin impressions in these three ¢:
ry not bear sufficient microscopic marks for determining whether or
not these three specimens were fired in the same weapon or for compariso:
with test specimens. Thie is also true of the head of the cartridge case
with respect to breech face marks and ejector marks, There are on these
three cartridge cases a few extractor marks, however, the marke are not
sufficiently distinct to identify these three specimens as having been
attrdcted from the same weapon, The marks on one of them are entirely
inadequate for comparison and only a few similarities were found between
the extractor marks on the other two specimens. There is possibility
that the extractor marks on the latter specimens could be identified with
those on test cartridge cases fired from the same weapon,
pr
¢
Ms | Tite
91 NT 91 1087 Go
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic