Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 12
Page 67
67 / 86
Hpw long had they
een passin
Britain's secrets t
Soviet Russia ?
PETROV Geciares they w
signed up by Soviet
telligence services while still
at Cambridge, It is irne that
bot were tien ardent Com-
munists, But so were thousands
of other Jiberal-minded young
men who turned to “Com-
munism in the dark days of
tine mid-thirties simply be-
cause they considered it the
best way of fighting Faseisi
When Hitler was defeated,
Most Gf them forgot all about
Communism, Way should
Russian agents have sejected
just these two from a!} the
Other university Communists
who have since become irre-
proachable citizens — and
patpiots? And what use could
they have been before tiev
had even decided what their
carer would be?
o. I think Donald Mac-
lean was approached much
later, when he was_ First
Secretary to ‘the British
Embassy at Washington,
around 1946, when he was in
a position to provide valuable
information and was svii-
ciently opposed to British and
American policy to believe
that he was helping the cause
of world peace by doing so.
How was it that he
qwas_not suspected
earlier 2
NE of the most disturbing
aspects of this dreadtul
affair is that Donald Maclean
Was allowed such a long run.
In his drunken moments be
was by no means careful,
citger in speech or action, and
often declared that he was a
Soyiet agent. Did none of his
fridnds or colleagues at least
Sugpect that he was betraying
his trust? If they did, way
did they not report hi
their superiors? If the
report him, why was no tio:
taken?
How thorough were
the investigations ?
A SENIOR official of M.S
‘ told me just before ihe
News Chronicle serialised m
book* last.year that his service
had been warning the Foreign
Office about Maclean “for
some time” before his flight.
He dict t say what the
warning about, Tt could
simply have been of Maclean’s|
behaviour, which was entirely
unsuitible for a senior Foreign
Service official.
But if the suspicion was by:
then of something tar graver,
how was it that ‘he was abic
to evade MM.L.5's net? He was
conspicuously tall and easy to
keep under observation if, for
example, he was meeting hig
Russian contact in a pub gr a
bar to. hand over Fordign
Office documents,
Even when the game wad up
and he had flown, bdth
Melinda, his American-born
wife, and her mother, Mv
Dunbar, told me that’ the
Vestigators who hurried
own “to-"Beaconshaw, his
house at Tatsfeld, when he
was reported missing, did not
troubie to examine “the mass
of papers-he left behind. Yet
by thea it must have veen
apparent that he was a spy. *
How much did
Melinda know ?
MPUERE is now a suggestion
that Melinda, who followed
Donald info exile with lher
three children 27 months later,
* *The Missing Macleans, rfb-
Ushed by Cassell and Co., Lid.
at 12s. td. net,
knew all the time that her hug-
bahd was a Soviet agent, ai
was indeed a Communist hei-
definite hard evidence I can-
not believe that it is, then she
was a superb actress, I knew
Melinda wel
Although it is evident ¢
sometime between Donald’
disappearance and her flizht
from Geneva she had been
told what he was doing—and
for inexplicable reasons of het
own had accepted the posi-
tion and agreed to go to him
1 am still sure she was the
simple, rather frivolous girl
with no political interests,
whatever she appeared. Ji
was not only to me that she
gave this impression, but to
many others of her frien:
idcluding girl. friends who
npght have had a mbre
cfitical approach.
What was Burgess's
role?
"PHE White Paper specitic-
ally mentions Donald
Maclean as “the principal
suspect” in a leakage of infor-
mation 10 the Russians, It
states that Burgess's
behaviour was unsatisfactory,
nO suggestion that
ny way implicated
in passing intormation,
Jt is also stressed that there
is no evidence of any
normal or suspicious con-
tact between the two men so
that were one suspected the
other would. automatically
come under suspician,
Were they in fact the team
they have all aiong been sup-
posed as they fled together ?
x Were they acting separately
5 Soviet agents, and only
Yrought together by he
tecessity of getting them hpth
ut of Englang at the sdme
me? it is an jmporfant
point,
NN
?
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
pigs operation
soviet control induce
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic