Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 13
Page 15
15 / 86
ee euteuanill
iia
one
botause they knew so many of the right
kpowing, Lady Violet Bonham Carter is a tenacious cof-
tyoversialist, and mere self-interest would make me withdrz
from what | wrote Jast week if I thought ber letter to the
Editor of the Spectator this week were justified. 1 have three
points to make in reply. (1) I never suggested that she had
used her influence to affect official decisions in the interests
fr many joumalists and editors have good reason fpr
‘of Burgess and Maclean. 1 was talking about the subtle
influence which is exercised by members of what 1 cal} the
‘Establishment’ in creating an attitude of mind to the whole
question of the disappearance of Burgess and Maclean. No
dofbt they did it for the best possible reasons—we all, T hope,
wauld stand by our friends—but there can be little doubt thét,
Je, a great del
otypressure was brought to bear in 1951 and 1952 to discount
the more sensational stories about Burgess and Maclean. {ii}
dy Violet says that all she did was to write a letter to The
Ttines adout the ‘hounding’ of Mrs. Maclean aad her family
and relations. Is she quite sure that she never sought to bring
pressure to bear oe the Express newspapers on precisely this
question? Is she quite sure that it was not due to any inter-
vention on her part that the attitude of the Daily Express .
became a matter, not just of editorial concern, but of mana-
gerial and perhaps even psoprietorial concern? (iii) As 1
believe the Editor of the Spectator makes clear in a footnote
to Lady Violet's letter, neither he nor I approve of the ‘hound:
ing’ of the family or relations of ‘malefactors (proved or
suspect}.’ But the point is that at no time did Mrs. Maclean*
show any inclisation fo cut herself off from the press. Never
did she complain to any individual journalist. She normally
- said what she had to say ‘olf the record.’ On one occasion when
she did say something ‘on the record’ to a number of
journalists, she telephoned ta Fleet Sireet to deny what she
it said even before the story itself had reached Fleet Sirdet.
is does not seem to be the behaviour of an innocent worpan
, Hounded" by the press. It suggests rather thet she was bging
guided by men extremely skilled in handling the press. ce
at,
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic