Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 13
Page 2
2 / 86
THE AMERICAN REPORT
BPRGESS: In 1949 whtle on holiday abroad fe
was guilty of “ indiscreet talk about secret mat-
ters of which he had official knowledge." " For
this he was severely reprimanded. Yet the
following year he was sent to Washington as a
Second Secretary at the Embassy,
Out there, the Ambassador put in a report on him
that made even the Foreign OMfice think about
firing bim.
Mis work was unsatisfactory, he lacked thorough-
ness and balance, the U.S. State Department
Jooked unfayourably on his reckless driving,
and he had had to be reprimanded for “ care-
lessness in leaving confidential papers un-
attended.”
it the Ambassador's request he was removed frqm
Washington. : .
hen the Foreign Office really got down to work:
“lHe was recalied to London in early May, 1951,
and was asked to resign from the Foreign Offife.
would be taken in the event of his refusitg to
do so. It was at this point that he] dis-
appeare
- So in view of this record, how could the
two men have stayed so long in this highly
secret service?
This is the White Paper answer-that is
no answer at all:
“ Action was taken in each case. It was
shortly before Maclean
serious suspicion of his rediabi
and active inquiries set on foot.”
And how could they have escaped when
the security sleuths were on their track?
“The watch on Maclean was made diffi-
cult by the need to ensure that he did not
become aware that he was under observation.
“It was inadvisable to increase this risk
by extending the surveillance to his home in
an isolated part of the country and he was
therefore watched in London only. .
“Both men were free to go abrowd at
sny time... In this country no arrest}can
we made without adequate evidence,
| Consideration was. being given to the stepythat
a
NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE
“At the time there was insufficicht
ebidence. It was for these reasons necessary
Jor security io embark upon the difficult aod
delicate investigation of Maclean, taking into
‘count the visk that he would be alerted; ~
cent he w .
That is the end of this sorry tale except
for a whitewash Jor the cence” of
Ministerial replics about the two men,
This is attributed to the necessity for
secrecy in espionage and counter-espionage.
That is the whitewash cover laid on to
protect the men who were guilty of sup-
plying successive Ministers with incomplete
information about these traitors, to be
passed on to the House of. Commons and the
public,
IT IS A PATHETIC DOCUMENT. A
RECORD OF FALTERING INDECISION.
It might almost have been designed to
demonstrate to the world that we are children
in the art of spying, and babies in arms at the
job of catching our own trait
Bot ubove all it Jeayes hanging in the air,
s menacing as that Thing which hang down
om the roof of the Abbey in the Quaternjass
ixperiment, the possibility of the existehee
still of a master spy able to tap the decisipns
of our most secret ser
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic