Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 23
Page 3
3 / 49
Cc
Truman admits in his Memoirs
(pp. 374-5) that there was 2 formal
commitment with the British, made
prior to November 6, 1950, not to
take action which might involve
attacks on the Manchurian side of
the Yalu without consultation with
"the British, He also states that this
_ information was first given Mac-
Arthur on that date in response to
his message of intent to bomb the
bridges. Is it jumping at conclu-
sions to presume that this fatal
commitment was known to the
British Far Eastern expert at the
* British Embassy in Washington
yr and to the Head of
abla et!
he
in London—and assuredly to the
*” Russians, the Red Chinese and the
North Koreans? When was the
Rot say, Its existence was “pointed
out” to him by Assistant Secretary
245 of State, Dean Rusk.
Almost as a fact-note to the gov-
erament’s silence on the case is 2
} Paragraph in an address by Secre-
. j tary of the Army Wilber M. Bruck-
*“t er, February 17, 1996 in which he
x] seems to largely overlook Burgess,
:| but does admit, for the first time
mj #9 an address cleared by the Exec-
sq Utive Branch of government, that
= Burgess and Maclean damaged
a American as well as British interests:
“Just last Saturday, the Soviets
Tne Buncrss-Macuran Case
—— ee se
the American: .
Department of the Foreign Office
; commitment made? Truman does’
Editor's Note: In the second installment: the men nobody knew—the people
who did know and who might have knowa—questions and recommendations
| he Brutecan Vier . Febe [957
13
finally unveiled Guy Burgess and
Donald Maclean, two prize pices
of evidence of the deceit and treach-
ery which have s0 long been prin- |
cipal characteristics of Communist
tactics, and have brazenly Aaunted
them in our faces. It is sobering «
indeed to reflect that one of them
held a high position in the British}
Embassy in Washington over a pe-
riod of four critical years, and knew: :
about some of our most closely
Buarded secrets—ssecrets of priceless
value to the communist conspira-’
cy.’ It - provokes’ equally serious
thought to recall that for almost
five yeags the Soviets have consist-
ently disclaimed any . connection’
with either of these men—have
sneeringly denied that they had fied.
to the Soviet Union. This successful
subversive operation, planned and
executed with consummate skill,
well illustrates not only the vicious ~ ’
“nature of the monster with which
we must deal, but also the depths
of its penetration into the vitals of
the Free World. It is a startling re-,
minder of the grim task ahead.”
H™, can we know unless we
are told? Is there any reason
on earth why at this late date the
full story of Burgess and Maclean
during their stays in this country—
their functions, their access to
American secrets and their Ameri-
can contacts—should not be clari-
fied? Is anyone, including Mr.
Brucker, reasonably sure that it
could not happen again?
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
pigs operation
soviet control induce
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic