◆ SpookStack

In’ common wi he Burgess-Maclean ntury. Doubly so, for’ )e8Cape, almos! Al deéper significance 4 Mustrated vividly, ith mii It was not @ story of Pursuit and t in the classic lions of other Bri to tish ‘newspaper? most fi one of the 2 Personal dilemma of two In- euther rovers! galigent and gifted men, he “Coed secrete a a whole eneration ‘Wittiam Express,” caught tn the confusion mand - Wher of the * Daly sentragletions of mid. * aren century Britain, with Its chronic lack a Pome burpose and {i "= 9% muddled -economene? RITING: A cen NE phrase lingered in blacks and whites, a contest, my Mind from the tween devils and ‘angels ? Mons of words Some years ago I had met : written about” Burgess and Guy Burgess on several . Maclean, They had been: aca slons ; he was at that time Gescribed as “split men.” a Bi) Was chis meant to be a term House of Or of contempt ? na a wus world, does not a manist— ust, in of owe If 80, wl fa doubts within hi Does an: tieve that Bfeatest issue t , , 4 I was impulsive MERRILL ch tenntnnh epid ‘war any thoughtful man now an international Igsue—and Parteul lari: our tims ly Felation | between East and we be discussed ‘adequately 4 B.C, representative at the | Commons, responsible for the ° Week In Westminster " programme. and I was one of : case the embers of Parliament who |i tions broadcast for him. ‘A few woets after the Moscow ‘| Frese sa erence, aotcing tha i HELPING: woe . abies gerne Seon, been 2 eastern " amply By wt pritiny to hii Sipe i + But would it? on a casual ey tOScOw ‘azaines’ |! HuMMRHRENMNCAARSMM EN | : 8 odds, OULD these causes be it seemed, rather "6 wrote to oopim. Joni I I asked if there were any |i chance of my bell able to in- terview “him “Yen® gia? Lon. i i 1 story, and answer the still un- srerered questions, it Tcame to j loscow. | berested In Is (not my personal but) An, Tsong Tela ‘and thelr “possible im- :|) Provement. “W about my ‘case’ 4 “1 don’t mind any amount of controversy about can and Soviet policy, but I am o. readers I had: ting’ news stories of ‘thi ve Mo however, in hing foun| ex it too often. “Bue this this was not an’ unwelcome toterrupticn. could ‘The operator asked if I take personal call from Mos-! cow, on arrived in Moscow. “k ie was not particularly : | ees Baga at e . 4 ' yu to be, for) celeste inte exactly wi 1 ‘was coming by, . But I took iow dinner of; bo te snd all the! " restofit at the Natlo a pc fetter aa Hotel: ” Not, pressinj See Aare eect tet tt faddrese whieh was all that had ascertained that a 8! wis local letter cost, 40 korpks 7 wf pelped 4 in ay wey, by glo-Ameri- to the main post ties’ (open i night): got the Tight ; amp by’ sign-language,’ since 7a! the Jady at the counter had n@:3 and I had no Russian 98 twig int es Me joked the right one xeS. aa labelled in indecinbe ; ble Cyrillic, : das ating wong tT luncheon. feellax. rather Sepresied ‘about the * nterpt al wi } Ieonetnioe bad gone oun , len Inailte d'hotel calcd oy otk was itroversy SPEAKING: olulely” lbarea “atin Bacay | MuePmone. | wa: < Absolui re oy Sonor usuaastR ° sickened by th the personal aspects speaking from os i ‘nce ee, case. a t In favour ' “I wouldn’t mind calling the | flat (or, as it t would be called in wns ater nea | Reet gus eo Ws | PBS Welk e me pa Ws, after I had |) Paper ats “inelr Peter ote not heed by respondent ee st at israeli oa ant Pitan if mabout people whe benafed en viet. citizens “ahd, receive, in quick succession. a In Buch a way : ‘I know ficial eles delegations, ‘ cordial cable and a8 Jong ht i. eal ity more cesple cable ‘nat : ante er ter read, in part: j ican ieee nic." t [Paimae esema"to me to go for Pr Trae