Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 34
Page 92
92 / 132
) Serely~stated —what—the—taw —was—TraTety
| that TOWN ite silel Av STORIE TAC
“but something was intcturater but did
‘Rat affect the reputation of the plaintiff, he
could not recover anything, H¢ conceded
thar the Act itself did not apply because the
Proceedings had been commenced before it
ca
into
i aw
a plaintift entitled to recover damages
assessed by a jury having regard to the con- |
duct of the defendants. ‘Section $ had |
effected a change in the taw, and was not '
in substance the law at the time when the
: proceedings were started. :
i Mr. Satmon, addr
| how any man could have the tc
come into Court in the circumstances of
HER end ask a British jury to give hrm}
ey. Me what the defendanis had tide
. che plaintiff was true he was “hoa
atid
mei
30
entitled to anything, Truth was a Cony fod |
Kigfence, ie defendanis had said thaw
wap. a spy and, on what he had hina
itted, ‘was there the slightest doub? oft)
Mhedsuth of that? From 1945 until ccrialy;
1950 he had been a paid secret agent often
régime in Prague, where from 1943 the (
yHists held the dominant positions in’
ermment, and it was not safe {ah
Gattosiovakian who was an anti-Gomer
Imanist to return. The plaintiff took many;
fin the régime in Prague for areas
i
io!
therCzechoslovakians in London and re}
iBY what they were doing. He had a
ia trae he did not know of anybody -excchtal
ia | étbuse of what he had "reported, wba
Hd could amane know pee
beNind the iron curtain. ain |
S94 course no complaint was nade)
Bécause no one in London knew tha Aye!
pill was carrying on that dispusth
c. AM the time he, was pretending’
Anti-Communistic. Could they thing of
anything baser than thai, or of grealen
ageachery ? : .
Referring 1 the alleged libel, counsel sai
that i was suggested ihat the sting in
was tha the plaintiff was a spy. “The jury
might think that that had been proved
beyond a peradventure, It was fantastic,
was it nol, that this man me he
nd ash for damages for Couriset
| Stgeesied that read fairly the arlicle did not
vy that he was the link with the missing
[gees J} SuREgSCD that he might be
et ia
“atti
Taajnc
init oe oF RLENUS) SECRI
fkoew this’ drtadfut "i
' plainiitt
‘The plaintifl had come before the jury
said that he bad -taken money fc
secrets of his friends in Lond:
ic in ‘whic!
and now he said he wanted them to give
him damages for fibet. He (counsel) ho)
was engaged, selling his friends,
nod her gad pe RaS Rite at ey |
that by their verdict the jury would express
their contempt
comemet for actions of this sort.
Mx.
his behaviour and their
SULLIVAN, making his final address
fo the jury, said that in Hobbs ¥.
Tiniing & Co. Ltd. ({1939] 2 KB. 1),
Lord Justice Greer (at p. 46) had said’ that
aman did not lose his right to damageg
character was not free from
because
reproach, and if newspapers for their
ses. falsely alleged that he had
der
Ave out to be blacker than th
ea! acter than ¢
Fay NO LONGER IN FRANCE * A
2sReferring to the alicged libel, he (coun
$4 in he ordinary sense of the word wa
rm
| ferno say in France that he was a spy ? dia
Was no longer in France when they éale
HRMS holds spy Strauss." "Third mam
“with missing diplomats 2" It was #id
by ‘the defence that because there wat
gee it was all right. If the law colerated
a thing all, our situations as citigens
< it peril. The papers cor
ything into aa interrogative ie mr
ames hasis of fis [counset’s) whol
ment was that this article meant thal dhe
iT was probably associated, or alge.
ith ad
the
watrcly was in fact associ "
mikting ‘diplomat’. He sugec "
wets meas prainiwt said
meant; that that meaning was defamatayyy,
and that there -were two or three mie
Statements of fae’. He asked for a verdict
in favour of the plaintit Igfex such temperate
and modesttamages as Me jury thought fit.
_His Lornsuiy said. that he would begin
his summing-up in the morning,
The hearing was adjourned,
Solicitors—Messrs, Edward Davies,
Nelson & Co.; Messrs. Lewis. & Lewisnaind
}Sishews 468, vn raters aarncheee
misconduct the juny
even a man of B®
ahafacter ought not to have his character
¢ proved tase
|.
|
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic