Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 37
Page 19
19 / 47
1487 | Former Sin Office”
Aah
fee buen
FORMER FORCIGN OFFICE
OFFICIALS (DISAPPEARANCE) .,
Motion made, and Question proposed,
That this House do now adjourn,
(Mr. Buchan-Hepburn] © * -
334 pm
‘The Secretary of State Sor Foreign
Affairs (Mr. Harold Macmillan): It
can rarely have happened in our long
Parliamentary history that the political
pov head of a Department should have had
be to unfold to the House of Commons so
tee painful a story as that which it is our
ad duty fo consider today. To understand—
. though not, of course, to excuse—this
ran i story it is necessary to cast our minds
back to the 1930s and to recall the kind
a of background against which the two
Principal characters grew up.
~ At that time all kinds of violent
opinions were being expressed. The
circumstances of the Spanish Civil War,
with Fascists and Communists backing
the rival forces, divided British and, in-
deed, European opinion acutely. This
had a particularly disturbing effect upon
oung people, many of whom, we remem-
ber, thought it their duty actually to take
part in these fierce revolutionary
siruggles. 1. bad o, 5,
When Hitler had made his pact with
Stalin and the Second World War began,
some of those who had espoused extremist
_ views found that their ideological beliefs
exerted a pull which was to prove stronger
than their patriotism. is clash of
loyalties was buried in 1941 by our
alliance with Russia. But, when the
war ended and there came an estrange-
> meat between this country and Com-
_ apunist Russia, it revived.
* Thus it was that men could be found
”. “jn Britain who could put the interests of
another country before those of their
own, and could commit the horribte crime
of treachery. This occurred not only
among criminals and degenerates, but io
amen holding bigh technical and scientific
ts, among men of philosophic and
Brerary attainments, and, finally, in these
two cases, the subject of this debate, ia the
Foreiga HO ee
There are many on both sides of the
House who, as Ministers of as private
- Members, have seen the work of the
wt 20 G
“
7 NOVEMBER 195S
Offcials—Disoppearance 1488
Foreign Service at home and abroad.’ E
know they will agree with me when 1
say how fortunate we are in this country
to have a Foreign Service of the highest
quality, giving the: most loyal and de
voted service to the Crown und to the
nation. 1 think that all of us today are
feeling how severe is the blow that has ¢
been struck against its reputation, Our |
Foreign Service regards this case as @ -,
rsonal wound, as whea something of the ;
ind strikes at a family, or a ship, or @
regiment. We must recognise, too, that
this case has caused a profound shock to
Parliament and to (he genera} public, both
at home and abroad. jai. by seat
1
* Before dealing with the actual handling
of this affair, [ want to say a few we
on the subject of ministerial responsi-
bility. When what is known as the
Maclean and Burgess case was entering its
fina) phase, with the findings of the Aus- ~
tralian Royal Commission and the publi-
cation of the White Paper, 1 made it clear
that full ministerial responsibility must be
taken by those Ministers, past and present,
who presided over or were connected with
the foreign Office during all this period.
This was not a mere act of quixotism or
chivalry; it is 8 plain constitutional
truth. Et will} be a sorry day when
we try to elevate something called the
Foreign Office or the Treasury or any ~
other Department of State into a separate
entity enjoying a kind of life, respon-
sibility and power of its own, not con
trolled by Ministers and not subject to
full Parliamentary authority. i Piterd
ee ee “ee oe Pia ema a4
~ Ministers. aod Ministers alone, mm
bear -the -responsibility for. what goes
wrong. -Afier all, they are not slow $0 -,
take credit for anything that goes right.
This does not mean that they have to
accept responsibility for wrongful acts on. }
the part of wbeir officials of which they
ave no prior knowledge. But in dis-
cussing this case it is quite wrong to
assert that the Foreign Office, if by that ~
is meant “ officials” made decisions of ~
their own. Ministers are responsible and,
in fact, took all the important decisions. ~
Moreover, they took those decisions im
full knowledge of afl the refevant facts
$0 far as they were known at the time. .
The House will realise that both the
Opposition and the preseat Government
share thé responsibility. The main acts
in the drama took place while the Op;
sition were in power. The investigation .-
sean sso
Pree See ee oe eal
beat
i
4
x
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic