Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 37
Page 46
46 / 47
PN Pn GSE NEED Aa OOM
sep AWA eR PNET REE OREN AREER
1 Former Pureign Office
sat people are moral, but that “B™
lass people are immoral? on
What is even queerer jis that when
hector McNeil asked whether Burgess
puld be put up into the “A” class the
Fquest was resisted. Why? If the
younds were failings of personal charac-
he should not bave been either “A”
“B*—{An Hon. Memper: “Or °C*
: *D*."]_ As an hon. Friend says, or
C" or °D,” and if he was merely being
rdged on his intellectual merits, he
Prould have been in the A class or
owhere.. .
jis is proof that the Foreign Office
$as worried about Burgess, but not wor-,
be enough, because he had already got
3s foot inside the door of the élite. There
ve have the two of them, Maclean right
$n the élite of the élite and Burgess push-
ing his way up by means of some some-
what unsavoury personal connections
which perhaps got him in in the first
place. A competent establishment officer
whould have forbidden Burgess ever to
have been appointed, and should certainly
have thought twice about giving Maclean, -
‘only three months after his nervous ~
‘ereakdown—notice that it was only three
amonths after the breakdown—the
fappointment as a head of a Department.
It is no good the Foreign Secre-
tary or the Prime Minister, of..
indeed, my right hon. Friend the
Member for Lewisham, South, telling
Perhaps ¥ am, and perhaps
this, because I lived in this sort of world, ~
Bu, the average man in the street, when
told that this is a true and satisfactory
explanation, knows perfectly well that
whatever clever men produced this type
of bunkum, it is always for the same
reason. In Britain, influential people do
pot want to have too much interrogation
or inquiry into what went on in the
Foreign Office élite, 4 sesince >=
The crime in the Foreign Office was,
first, to turn a blind eye to Maclean's
deficiencies for far too tong; to prefer
Private friendship and belief in him to
public duty, and ihea when he bad gone,
to prefer Deparimental loyaky to duty
to this country. We are a democracy and
we really have the right to know the facts
when something has gone wrong... --
I want, in conclusion, to say two thin;
briefly about the proposals fox ani Hea
which bave come from this side of the
uc@
Ire that I am a suspicious ope of person, .
understan
7 NOVEMBER 1955 Officials. Drveoronce 1a
.a Spy selling himself for money. For this ..
fas!
House. First of all, I will say a word
about our proposals for an inquiry into ~
security. After the Foreign Secretary's
speech I feel much Jess need for this ine
quis than I did before the debate. But,”
then, I never believed that security was
the main problem in this case. The main
‘oblem is ‘the establishment of the
‘oreign Office, and the conduct that was -
committed in the Foreign Office. ~ ~~
Still on security, I have one point to~
make in addition to what my right hon,
Friend said. I think the Foreign Secre-
lary was absolutely right in saying that
we are back in the Elizabethan age and
that treason has become a sibility ;°T
would say that it is a possibility for every ~~-
thoughtful man. Everyone who faces the’ -
world’s dilemmas today finds his national
loyalties in conflict with others. We have
talked about Russia, but there might be
a conflict between our national foyaley. _
and American interests. The Russians are
not the only people who have secret ser-
vices. J can conceive of a time when an
Englishman might think if his duty to
ass information on to America, feeling
¢ had a moral duty to do $0, and then,
Jater, he might well be proved to be a
traitor if the world went the wrong wi
for him. ~ oa rn
2
The Foreign Secretary is right. This te
a basic problem. Surely, then, the Prime
Minister wil} agree that policemen are
really no g for this job. We have to ~*~
detect the type of person who is note”
common criminal. Such a person is not
detectable in the ordinary way ; he is not
one has to have an_understanding
of Marxism and other philosophic prob-
Jems of the modern world. I should feel
8 great deal more confident if I had been ©
told that we are ¢o have a heads of M.LS
mot ex-policemen but people who have
studied deeply the ideologies of the
modern world and cap put themselves in ~
the place of young men and know what
they are feeling. We want @ new type
of person for this task. The Jess we have ~
of security the better, provided that the
quality of it is really first-rate. -. tt
. Secondly, I would remind the Houss
that this searching for spies is really a
relatively small part of security. Nine-"
tenths of security means security against
carelessness, security to prevent informa
lion going to the enemy, either because ~
of their technical power to break dows
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic