◆ SpookStack

AD 24 0-88 Ofcourse, this rule cuts both ways. Material distributed to the public at large may not be judged by its appeal to the most sophie ticatea,2° nor by its appeal to the 17 ana I believe that the cases establish most susceptible. that material whose use will be restricted to those i: whose hands it will not have a prurient appeal is not to be judged by its appeal to the populace at large. : In Commonwealth v. Landis, 8 Phila. 453 (@.8. 1870) defendant had been convicted of publishing an obscene riper 28 The court approved a charge to the Jury in which it was stated that the publication would be justified if “made for a legiti- mate and useful purpose, and .. mot made from any motive of mere gain or with a corrupt desire to debauch society." , 8 Phila. 453, 454 (Q.S. 1870). While scientific and medical publications "in proper hands for useful purposes” may contain 16 see the charge to the pr quoted in Roth v. United " States, 354 U.S. 476, 490 (1957). 17 «Butler v. Michigan, 52 0.8. 380 §2957)5 Yolanski v. United States, (6th Cir. 1957). 18 me book was entitled "Secrets of Generation." . Commonwealth v. Gordon, 66 D. & C. 101, 121 (Phila. Q.8. 1949).