◆ SpookStack

prurient interest. For those who would seek to pander materials such asp those libelled in this case, I need hardly express ny contempt. Nor need I add that the theory of this decision, rightly interpreted, affords no comfort to those who would import materials such as these for public sale or private indulgence. The cry against the circulation of obscenity raised by the law-abiding community is a legitimate one; and one with which Congress, the State legislatures, and the courts have been seriously concerned." When that case arises in which the Government determines that it should go to trial upon the facts, a showing that multiple copies of a particuler piece of matter are sought to be imported by the same person 41 qhe Government also maintains that the holding in United States v. One Itscene Book Entitled "Married Love," . 2. DN.Y. a cision t a booxw Is importable under §305(a) 1s res judicata ina subsequent libel, precludes my holding that material is to be judged by its appeai to those who will see it, But the successive importations in that case were both for the purpose of dis- tributing the book to the public at large. I see no reason for extending the rationale of the cited case beyond the situation in which the succeaslve importaticns are for the> purpose of distributing the material to the same ptrson or elass of persons. : 42 See Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 485 (1957).