◆ SpookStack

This is the king of cvidence the UFW hes in its. legal cese against the Teamsters. A feraworker: "Firsp} off, Ido not wistr to be represented\: the Teamsters and secondly, I never signed that peti- tion. My name is there, but it is not my signature. I would never sign a petition like that. I am angered that someone else would put my name on @ pe- tition like that. I am and always have been a loyal "Chaviste" and do not want the Teamsters et all.” -- a worker from H & M Tennecc. The Ufu will bring a legal case soainst the Teamsters, claiming that they forged many farm worker names to their so-called list of 4,100! Second, the UF will show that the Teamsters used force to get people -to sign a pe- tition saying they wanted to be repre- sented by the Teamsters Union. It should be pointed out here that the growers ere not completely free from blame. All the growers in the Coachella Valley, except Steinberg and Larson, signed with the Teamsters. Whether the grovers whe signed with the Teamsters coopereted in the above mentioned ime proper activity, we probebly will never know, In the end we will see that all parties--orowers, Teamsters and UFw-~ made mistakes. Bs far as the UFW is concerned, no matter what the courts do, (justice grinds exceedingly slowly at times) the future cf their union is at stake. They cannot wait for court decisions. Right now the Teamsters have 85% of the Coachella Val- ley teble grape contracts. As tough Ralph Cotner of the Teamsters puts it: "We've got no reasons to leave. We got the workers...and we're gonna keep ‘em.” So, the UFW has called an ali out strike- boycott of Coachella Valley Teamster grapes. be will report later on about the present status of the strike and how effective it nas been. B. One last thing about Teamster statis- tics and techniques. NEWSWEEK (May 21, 4973) reported thet by March 1, 1973, the Teamsters asserted they had more than 4,100 signatures of farm workers who mainteined they wanted the Teamsters as theiz umiar. At th time, tovever, there Ler att mpt mene “ip the grépe vlnreysros! To Se cert this, on Jure 20, 1973, we contacted Floyd Mar- lowe, Farm Worker Representative, Calif. Dept. o an Resources Development. He said trategn March 30, 1973, show that Jhere were 500 farm ic the grapes. Pre-harvest work of was being done and hence mot thst workers were in the Coachelle Velley et that time. How \did the Teamsters get the 4,402 names they have on their list? No ore seems to know and they are not telling. At this writing (June 22) Mr. Mer ~ says there are 3900 field worke grapes. Th2re are 1,000 striker there are approximately 4,900 f. ers in the Valley at this time. of the 4,900 are UFW strikers; encther 6800 are UFW ferm workers employed by Ler- son and Steinberg, the two growers in the Coachella Valiey that signed with Ceser Chavez. That leaves 3,100 ferm workers in the fields of growers with Teamster tontracts. Are all these workers com- mitted to the Teemsters? Increzsinoly we are finding by talking to "Teamster" farm workers that they need money. They ere poor people and the grape harvest is One of the ways they can make s' morey to keep them going. Many supp: Ceser Chavez and the UFW. We cannct begin to Speculate ss to how the Teamsters cot their figure of G,100. But we co heve some leads. , The following decleretion was given under oath: I have been working for the’ ------- Company for the last 6 years. Until Monday, the 16th of April, I worked un- Ger UFW contrect. Two times the Team sters came to our fields befcre the Lf contract expired. They esked me to sicn @ piece of paper whereby I would suppor the new Teamster contract. I toic them I didn't want to sign because I was 2 Teady represented by the unicn of Ceser Chavez. I saw that the majority of + other people who were working with me didn't want to sign. 7 On Monday, April 16, the UFL cs expired. The next day man, instead of sending us to work, us to stay in the camp. He ¢ would be paid that day even + Gidn't work. A little bit let Teamsters arrived. Serry boss of the camo, was t - ©