◆ SpookStack

Ly Themes Bybee, rake the folllreina ocr ssn 232 i | | a | jl | i a woth we Hanh & prenuses made fo me LT ne necegncher alt tu Tevae Tee Taito fine ov dale ¢ the loleabruictier. Hrwevei, Latn know Ler a fact tnt I ry paseansh vide babonte wes indoclrsl to bes ts a Theale nee fo tas | te_path deskeojee exsil pores ehnobidely ae On San 13,03. tat L hael nottect” { Pacer Dr. Sones _omel tel, - Bos the feist dre Yat te 30 sins ¢, He plegua, lenin Were rtiss hg» owe hin Hus explana fier Wo demons finfe why T could not accoun F for bow pin backer ie, Hut hel bore vx my pecsassioe. J vaade o walsiudganent by not bil him Hak te plage bacbrin hud bein accident, lebosedl 2arlein redler. Hoan Drroncousl gu Tan 0,03. Wykeaersd frat fessnd mals Lknow the paltawymwins dettioncl om there ams 12 Howat: to Heo public. , © prow ainuccurate syplmats DeSomes and cid MaDined Lan tatenste iavestinafasrar Atl I oidan 4 He EBL cael beet janestioa fon two tguine sick, june, wil babe. | font, dwidewce. Hes. Tnaabeyedl ct ses imperfeart to covect [nay LeaBiés misiudganout”omel put Hus mall bolnel uS. ob “ing him an out” Butler soon confirmed Green’s scenario by smiling, Green said. “This wasn’t a ‘That’s a good joke’ smile. ... This was ‘I got caught with my hand in the cookie jar,” he testified. Then, Green asked Butler to write a statement. In it, the researcher ad- mitted to “accidentally” destroying the vials and making a “misjudgment” by re- porting them missing. At the trial, the two men differed sharply over how the admission was crafted and what it was intended to accomplish. Green said he wanted Butler to reassure the public that it was not in danger, and that he sug- gested only a few specific phrases. But But- ler testified that Green essentially dictated large chunks of the document. The two men . went “back and forth,” Butler testified, until the handwritten note (see graphic above) be- came a “composite effort which fit what he = wanted and what I felt comfortable with” Among the things Green wanted was a sentence saying that investigators had made “no threats or promises” to obtain the state- ment, the researcher testified. But Green “tricked and deceived” him, Butler told the television news show 60 Minutes in August, just hours before the gag order was imposed. And he-testified that the FBI agent had as- sured him that if he recalled destroying the vials, “we'll both walk out of here and no- -Butler answered more wwwisciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL302 19 body will be investigated” Green disputed that claim. After the statement was finished, Butler was given paper chase. Texas Tech medical school dean Richard Homan re- a second polygraph, which assures the public at a press conference held soon after Thomas agents claim confirmed his new account. Next, questions and then cooled his heels while the agents met in another room. At about 8 p.m.—barely 24 hours af- ter the investigation started—Butler learned, that he was under arrest. ‘The news sparked confusion and outrage among scientists and friends. In the 10 months between his ‘arrest and the start of his trial, several scientific organizations and individuals rallied to Butler's defense. Some, including a quartet of Nobelists, loudly de- nounced how the government had treated him—including 6 days in jail, the yanking of his passport, and house arrest with an electronic anklet. “Tom Butler is not a crim- inal,” says laureate and longtime Butler friend Peter Agre of Johns Hopkins. “He’s a fine and honorable physician-scientist working for the good of mankind” He and more than 50 others have donated to Butler's defense fund. Others predicted that Butler’s case might scientists “from embarking upon wing crucial bioterrorism-related BER 2003 Butler signed a statement that he had destroyed the 30 missing vials of plague bacteria. Butler later recanted the statement, saying it had been coerced by FBI agents. scientific research,” as two presidents of the US. National Academies put it in an August letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft. And the “seemingly selective prosecution taises extremely scrious concerns,” the New York Academy of Sciences’ human rights committee added in September. Both groups pressured the government to drop the charges. But after several delays, Butler’s trial finally began on 3 November, ‘On trial in Lubbock It didn’t have to happen. Prosecutors offered Butler a plea bargain that included 6 months in prison and a fine, if he agreed to plead guilty to several charges, according to media reports, But Butler, who friends say can be stubborn, balked at any deal involving jail time, He decided to roll the dice. It was a big gamble. Texas Tech has a tra- dition of settling work-related disputes with employees, says Victoria Sutton, a bioterror law expert at the university who advised the 2061