◆ SpookStack

bé b7c ‘ Re: 279R-WF-222936-USAMRIID, 09/26/2006 To: Washington Field From: Washington viel? suites, with additional observations_including information about tvins ana[— There were no unusual activities or statements made by co-workers that would lead interviewees to suspect someone’s involvement in the anthrax mailings of 2001. Interviewees that knew did not mention any unusual behaviors performed by flo one witnesse allowing unfettered access to lab or other Tw es to individuals not permitted to be there. It is believed all ofL__] work was with attenuated strains ax and was in_accordance with duties. In an interview tated that LJ dia not have a good relationship with Ivins. was mostly described as a competent worker who was supportive of individuals. No one ion of involvement with any unusual activit was described as is work life because was in control of his home life.” Ivins was described as odd by many individuals. It was further explained that he may be socially inept, but that he was in general a "good" guy. No one believed that his personality translated to his work in a negative way. Ivins was described as professionally competent, intelligent, and someone who liked to joke around. No one mentioned witnessing any unusual activities performed by him. Investigative Goals Ongoing initiatives include: interviewing the remaining individuals, detailing the itesl Tex individuals who accessed the containment areas of Suites from approximately 9/1/2001 to 10/15/2001 using detailed analysis of time and attendance schedules and keycard access records, and lab notebook reviews to conduct a comparative study of the timeline versus statements made in interviews for significant persons. Information will be plotted in chart format by the general analys individuals identified as having accessed the between 9/1/2001 and 10/15/2001 are: