Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 169
169 / 354
57, {Continued}
~~ _SESRETT
The Attorney General raised the question of the attitude of
Turkey, Italy, Western European countries , all of which have been
“under the gun" for years, and would take the position that now that
the U.S, has a few missiles in their backyard, they become hysterical,
This point was discussed back and forth by various people throughout
both days of discussion.
Secretary McNamara made the point that missiles in Cuba had
no great military consequence because of the stalemate mentioned in
my October 18th memorandum. General Taylor supported this view
in the early parts of the discussion, but in the later meetings expressed
increasing concern over the importance of the missile threat from Cuba.
Gilpatric supported McNamars's position. McCone doubted it, stating
that McNamara's facts were not new as they had appeared in estimates
months ago (which McNamara questioned). Nevertheless, he and
McCone felt that a complex of MRBMs and IRBMs in Cuba would have
very jmportant military significance. McNamara took issue claining
that the military equation would not be changed by the appearance of
these missiles,
Bohlen and Thompson questioned the real purpose of the Soviet's
actions in Cuba and seemed to feel that their acts may be in preparation
for a confrontation with President Kennedy at which time they would
seek to settle the entire subject of overseas bases as well as the
Berlin question, McCone indicated this might be one of several
objectives and undoubtedly would be the subject of discussion at the
time of confrontation ; however, McCone doubted that this was the
prime purpose of such an elaborate and expensive installation as
the Soviets were going forward with in Cuba. Bohlen seemed to
favor precipitating talks, and was supported by Thompson,
SecDef and Taylor both objected to political talks because
it would give time for threatening missiles to become operational
and also give the Soviets an opportunity to camouflage the missiles.
McCone presented most recent photographs and indicated CIA opinion
that the first missiles will be operational within one or two weeks,
Bohlen again raised the question of opening up discussions,
McNamara agreed that wexxhoukkbe this would be desirable but ,
emphasized the importance of developing sequence of events which
would lead to military action.
~2 =
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic