Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 171
171 / 354
57. (Continued}
Soviet bases and offensive weapons in the Western Hemisphere would
raise serious problems and therefore on September 5th and 13th the
President has in effect warned both Khrushchev and Castro,
would result
Rusk continued that more talks with Khrushchev/n extended
parlays and therefore he recommended against such an approach.
Rusk then proposed that we bold until the middle of next week and
then follow the OD course No. 1 (52 sorties against MRBMs), Prior,
we inform key allies probably on Tuesday (Macmillan, de Gaulle,
Adenauer, possibly the Turks and a few Latin American Presidents},
On Wednesday, we strike with missiles and simultaneously send a
message to Khrushchev, NATO, OAS, etc. We should be alert for
an attack on Turkey and be prepared for the consequences in Berlin,
Quemoy, Matsu, Korea, etc. Rusk made the estimate that world
opinion would go along, 42 allies would go along and some neutrals
would be favorable, Latin Americans must be told that we are acting
in the interests of the Western Hemisphere. Rusk advocated that the
first step -- we take out the missiles and thus remove the immediate
problem of the establishment of an offensive capability, but that we
be.prepared for subsequent steps. He emphasized the United States
cannot accept missiles in our security interests and in view of state-
ments made by the President and others and our various policy
declarations. Bohlen continued to persist for diplomatic approach
but Rusk and several others were not at this point persuaded.
McNamara raised innumerable questions concerning military opera-
tions; the manner in which the strike could be properly covered with
protective air and how it might be restricted and also the advisability
of case one, as contrasted with case one, two and/or three.
Both Ambassador Thompson and Secretary Martin in discussing
the Rusk proposal favored a blockade, coupled with a declaration of war.
General Taylor at this point spoke in favor of a military strike
taking out the MRBMs and the planes as well, and was supported by
McCone, who took the opportunity to cover the points set forth in
“talking paper for principals, October 17, 1962",attached. Also
during the course of these meetings, McCone reported to the group
and later to the President the results of his discussions with General
Eisenhower, as covered in the attached memorandum of October 17th,
this subject.
A Senet ~
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic