Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 182
182 / 354
60. (Continued)
¢
and depending on th Rio pact, This, he indicated,wWxight have the
possibility of prevention of action and settlement by political meana,
The other course open was the declaration of war. Rusk expressed
himself in favor of leaning upon the Rio pact, but does not dismiss
the alternative of a unilateral declaration of war as the ultimate action
we must take. The alternate is a quick strike.
Ambassador Bohlen was not present but his views were expressed
in a message which was read in which he strongly advocated diplomatic
effort and stated that military action prior te this would be wrong, He
urged against action first and then decisive value of discussion. He also
stated that limited quick military action was an illusion and that any
tnilitary action would rapidly escalate into an invasion, McNamara at
this point presented the alternatives referred to the previous day,
stating that alternatives one and two were not conclusive and that we would
have to resort to alternative 3 and in fact this would lead us ultimately
into an invasion.
General Taylor generally reviewed the situation stating that the
Chiefs looked upon Cuba as a forward base of serious proportions, that
it cannot be taken out totally by air; that the military operation would
be sizeable, nevertheless necessary.
Ambassador Thompson urged that any action be preceeded by a
declaration of war; he strongly advocated that we institute a blockade
and not resort to military action unless and until it is determined that
Castro and Khrushchev refuse to reverse their activities and actually
remove the missiles which are now in place. ,
Secretary Dillon questioned what would be accomplished by talking
to Khrushchev. He pointed out that we would probably become engaged in
discussions from which we could not extract ourselves and therefore our
freedom of action would be frustrated, Dillon was very positive that
whatdver action we take should be done without consultation with Khrushchev.
Rusk seemed to disagree indicating there was a possibility that Khrushchev
might be persuaded to reduce his efforts but he admitted also that he might
.step them up as a result of discussions.
President Kennedy was non-committal, however he seemed to
continually raise questions of reactions: of our allies, NATO, South
America, public opinion and others. Raised the question whether we Va
‘should not move the missiles out of Turkey. All readily agreed they
were not much use but a political question was involved. Bundy
thought this a good idea either under conditions of a strike or during &
preliminary talk. ,
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic