Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 183
183 / 354
60. (Continued)
y e wa soy. ..
4
|
|
|
|
| McNamara discussed in some detail the effecta of a strike
[ indicating that we could expect several hundred Soviet citizens to be
} killed; he pointed out that all of the Sam sites were manned exclusively
! by Soviets and a great many Soviet technicians were working on the
“MRBMs and at the air fields. He agreed that we could move out of
| Turkey and Italy; pointed out the political complications. At this point
McNamara seemed to be reconsidering his prior position of advocating
military action and laid special emphasis on the fact that the price of
Soviet retaliation, whether in Berlin or elsewhere, would be very high
and we would nat de able to contral it.
Secretary Ball throughout the conversation maintained the position
that strike without warning was not acceptable and that we should not
proceed without discugsion with Khrushchev. President Kennedy then
said that he thought at some point Khrushchev would say that if we made
a move against Cuba, he would take Berlin. McNamara surmised
perhaps that was the price we must pay and perhaps we'd lose Berlin
anyway. There followed an exchange of view on the possibility of the
Soviets taking Berlin and our prospect of retaining it. .
i
{
|
I
i
4
{
|
|
| President Kennedy rather summed up the dilemma atating that
action of a type contemplated wauld be opposed by the alliance - on
the other hand, lack of action will create disunity, lack of confidence
| and disintegration of our several alliances and friendly relations with
| countries who have confidence in us.
1
‘
As a result of discussions of the "price" of a strike, there
followed a long discussion of the possibilities of a blockade, the
advantages of it, and manner in which it would be carried out, etc,
There seemed to be differences of opinion as to whether the blockade
should be total, or should only involve military equipment which
would mean blockading Soviet ships. Also there were continued
references to blockading ships carrying offensive weapons and there
seemed to be a differentiation inthe minds of some in the policy of
blockading offensive weapons as contrasted to blockading all weapons.
There followed discussion aa to policies the President should
follow with respect to calling Congress into session, asking for a
declaration of war, advising the country and authorizing action.
Thompson continued to insist that we must communicate with Khrushchev.
There was a discussion concerning the President's meeting with Gromyko
and the position he should take should the Cuban question core up. The
President was advised to draw Gromyko out and it was indicated he
probably would receive a flat denial that there were any offensive weapons
in Cuba.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic