Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP96 00792r000300020002 1
Page 54
54 / 57
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300020002-1
TLN465-92
be hypothesized that events far apart in time can form a contuun through
this type of overlap. This explains the phenomenon of precognition,
because there would be no information transfer over time. Toben and Wolf
hypothesized channels between widely separated time and space which
allowed PSI to transcend time and space. However, no one knows how to
test this theory.
UNIVERSE LINES
In images of the traditional three dimensional universe, the basic
particles are represented with a dot. However, in Einstein’s four
dimensional time and space continuum, basic particles are described as
lines. In the four dimensional universe, part of this universe line
represents the past positions of this particle, and the other part
represents the future positions of the particle. Nash believes that these
universe lines connected people’s minds to events far removed in time and
space, and provided a basis for PSI. Through a shift of Universe lines,
within the scope of the Heisenber@ uncertainty principle, information on
the state of certain particles could, without the use of any energy, be
transmitted to particles in the sensor’s brain. Through the causal
effects of the past, information on the future states of the object coils
be passed on to the sensor’s brain. The PK effect. would also be caused by
particles in the brain, which would be passed through universe lines to
the particles of the external objects.
LONG RANGE EFFECT HYPOTHESIS
Einstein, Bodolisike (translator’s note: phonetic} and Rosen
announced an experimental idea, which was the famous EPR fallacy. In this
fallacy, two members of a pair of subatomic particles stuck together such
as photons or protons are separated, and then are observed. According to
the theories of quantum mechanics, these two members have a certain
physical state, such as spin, that would be opposite in value. It would
not be known which would rotate upward and which would spin downwards
until they were separated and observed. If, after separation, one of the
particles were observed to be spinning in a certain direction, then the
other particle would be spinning in the opposite direction, regardless of
how far they were spart. This requires the transfer of information at 4
speed greater than that of the speed of light. Einstein used this
experimental idea as the basis for opposing the theory of quantun
mechanics with which he did not agree, because this theory contained the
element of probability. However, since then, a number of physicists have
performed laboratory experiments in order to support this theory of
quantum mechanics which is in opposition to the EPR argument. Two of
these were American Physicists John Clauser and Abner Shimony. They
reached a conclusion: The results of the experiment must led to one of
the two following conclusions. The first conclusion is that when the spin
of the first particle is observed, the spin of the second particle is
determined at the same time. Under these conditions, one is forced to
recognize the existence of the simultaneous long range effect. The other
55
Approved For Release 2000/08/10 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000300020002-1
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic