◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

JolyonWest

70 pages · May 08, 2026 · Document date: May 7, 1964 · Broad topic: Intelligence Operations · Topic: Paul Sharp Said · 70 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
$G1iB Technical ppposell For ReleasSHORE B/NDRQRNM-00789R003100200001-5 1.5 Research Methodology and Support (SOW 6.3) (U) 1.5.1 Committees (SOW 6.3.1) (U) (U) We propose to use the existing committees as support and quality control for methodological and policy issues. These committees are the Scientific Oversight Committee (SOC), the Institutional Re- view Board (IRB), and the Policy Oversight Committee (POC). 1.5.1.1 The Scientific Oversight Committee (U) (U) The five voting members of the SOC are respected scientists from the following disciplines: physics, astronomy, statistics, neuroscience, and psychology. The membership is as follows: © Steven A Hillyard, Ph.D. Professor of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego @ S. James Press, Ph.D. Professor of Statistics, University of California, Riverside © Garrison Rapmund, M.D. Liaison with the Institutional Review Board (see below) ®@ Melvin Schwartz, Ph.D. Director, High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Brookhaven NL ® Yervant Terzian, Ph.D. . Chairman, Department of Astronomy, Cornell University @ Philip G. Zimbardo, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, Stanford University (U) The SOC is tasked with three major responsibilities: © Review and approve all experimental protocols prior to the collection of data. ® Critically review all experimental final reports as if they were submissions to technical scientific jour- nals. All remarks are in writing and are included in the final technical report to the sponsor. © Suggest directions for further research. (U) In addition to these three responsibilities, the SOC members are encouraged to exercise un-announced drop-in privileges to view experiments in progress. 1.5.1.2 Institutional Review Board (U) (U) The IRB’s responsibility is to assure the safety of human subjects in experiments and to assure the sponsor that all research involving the use of human subjects is in compliance with all appropriate feder- al regulations. The IRB members represent the health, legal, and spiritual professions in accordance with government guidelines. The membership is as follows: @ Byron Wm. Brown, Jr., Ph.D. Biostatistics, Stanford University @ Gary R. Fujimoto, M.D. Occupational Medicine, Palo Alto Medical Foundation @ John Hanley, M.D. . Neuropsychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles ® Robert B. Livingston, M.D. Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego ® Robin P. Michelson, M.D. Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco @ Ronald Y. Nakasone, Ph.D. Buddhist Studies, Institute of Buddhist Studies, Berkeley, CA ® Garrison Rapmund, M.D. (Chair) Air Force Science Advisory Board © Louis J. West, M.D. Neuropsychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles Approved For ReleasS EQOREMANOR@BH6-00789R003100200001-5 15
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 59
Jump straight to page 59 of 70.
Reader
Paul Sharp Said Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Intelligence Operations archive hub and the more specific Paul Sharp Said topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
Related subtopics
Cambridge Five Spy Ring
41 documents · 2950 known pages
Subtopic
MKULTRA
28 documents · 928 known pages
Subtopic
Interpol
17 documents · 1676 known pages
Subtopic
Basque Intelligence Service
10 documents · 965 known pages
Subtopic
Release 2000 08
2 documents · 77 known pages
Subtopic
08 08 Cia-Rdp96-00789R000100260002-1
1 documents · 4 known pages
Subtopic