Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
9 11 Commission Report — Part 34
Page 14
14 / 23
To: Counterterrorism From: Berlin
Re: 315N-WF-227135, 12/05/2003
b6
b7C
Chief Judge Rlihle then asked if Fromm was aware that
Binalshibh had flown to Malaysia before his travels to Afghanistan,
and whether Fromm could explain the significance of this fact. Fromm
answered that he had no authority to testify further on this matter.
The Chief Judge then asked whether Fromm could completely
exclude the possibility that the idea and plan to use aircraft as
bombs had existed before the group's trip to Afghanistan. Fromm said
that this could not be completely discounted.
Associate Judge (First Name Unknown) Sakuth then asked why
they gave up on their plan to go to Chechnya. Fromm answered, "no,"
and added that he could give no further information.
He then asked Fromm if he could explain the group's
motivation for changing their plans. Again, Fromm answered, "no,"
and added that he could give no further information.
Chief Judge Rlihle then asked Fromm what exactly he had
meant with his answer, "no." He asked whether Fromm meant that he
did not know the answer to the question, or that he was not
authorized to provide an answer to that question.
Fromm answered that if he provided any further explanation
in his answers, then the court and the public would know what he did
or did not know.
Chief Judge Ruhle explained to Fromm that this was why he
had been called as a witness before the court.
Defense attorney Giil Pinar now complained to the court
that it was treating Fromm differently than how it had treated the
FBI witness. When the FBI witness had advised the court that he did
not have the authority to testify on that matter, the court had only
laughed and allowed him to continue.
Chief Judge Rtthle informed Pinar that Special Agent
had presented the court with a written authorization
restricting his testimony to certain matters.
Fromm now testified that he did not want to say further
what he did or did not know.
The Chief Judge explained that the issue revolved around
whether he was or was not authorized to testify before the court on
these matters.
Fromm testified that he did not want to disclose matters
about which someone would be able to deduce that his agency was in
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic