Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ABSCAM — Part 6
Page 13
13 / 57
oe id handed Wil-
“liams a sealed envelope. The senator’s . |
hands trembled as ‘he opened it: He.
~-Stared at the letter and his face dropped.
His‘ eyes moved across: the" page again
“and again. 523.02 a EE eee
“Then in a low voice, choking back
:” his emotion, Williams said: *They won’t
", Postpone (the hearing).’ " woke
- , The article went on to depict Williams.
’ as a beleaguered man who was now en-
’ meshed in a variety of legal maneuvers :
...and who not only gota raw deal from
the feds but- was now getting’ a raw deal .
from his Senate colleagues. It went on tor. .
-* fote that the Ethics Committee had. cee
__ vetoed his choice of ex-Sen: Morgan as :
‘counsel, because Morgan had served'on . .
the committee through 1980 and had - .
|. been privy to some discussions of he
“ It also noted that Williams wanted to
. Make the hearing “thé most profound
examination” of Abscam to date. Andit
carries Williams's charge that the jury at, ©
his criminal trial had been denied impor- |
" tant evidence that he wanted brought -- .
day L Arnies,
Chief Investigate
"out in committee, 2 et ns
Despite this sympathy-invoking PR
_ Ploy on behalf of Harrison Williams, his oo
colleagues ultimately voted 5-0 for his .
" expulsion, a matter that will be taken up
by the full Senate some time in January... .
Why Jack Anderson is so committed : .
to centering his. attack on Abscam’ =< -.
around the plight of Harrison Williams .— -
stew aye ea ne . Presents an intriguing question. ~°-;...- -
“decorated resi-* comparative passing—but which is hard- Thus millions of Anderson’s readers’ :
£f properties that ‘ly true in the case of Williams, . <- i"? are left to ponder the question of why a” ~
Jominium in the’ _ * Perhaps the most maudlin and bizarre : man who evidenced a long history of ine.
ies ‘in. southwest ‘example of Anderson’s seeming obses- - volvement in spurious transactions, al--_
eer acquired by sion with Williams’s alleged innocence lowed his wife to become tied to a New \° -
her marriage to" was a July 13 column that veered sharply ~ Jersey gamblin; casino venture while she <-’
BhIt § . _, from Anderson’s usual muckraking tone . was employed by the committee he
: ’ into a blatant effort to elicit public sym- chaired, and accumulated almose
and inglorious pathy for the senator... - _. * $400,000 in cash for the purchase of a
rson has goneto -. Written after Williams’s conviction iti Georgetown residence should be depict-
‘te Williams into federal court, the article dealt with the ed as an innocent pawn caught up in a.
f Abscam. Col- — then-upcoming_ hearing by the Senate “White House‘inspired political vendetta...”
“oncentrated on. Ethics Committee. It describes how his _ | While the trap sprung on the six. -
o New Jersey's colleagues refused to postpone the hear- ~ House members appears, in fact, to have _
ious-and vindic- ing to give Williams mote tine to Bre-"" been politically motivated, the probe of |.
‘iberal Kennedy “pare and how ‘they denied his request - Harrison Williams was long overdue.-.
‘gument that is © that former . Sen. .Robert. Morgan "Why Jack Anderson won't recognize :
2 six congress- (D-N.C.) be allowed to Serve as his at- ‘that fact is & ‘question that should be, .
defends only in .. torney for the proceeding... 2 * answered: $733 Le Scan ©
\nderson’s now defunct magazine, the “Inveg ator,” pictures a
left, with his then chiefinventigator, Jay J. Armes, Sat
e
4 Pa oe
inues Williams
as a stockhold- ““are’such as to depict Willi
ams and his defense of the wealthy senator and its.
ator,” it was wife as the ultimate innocents. They | hypocritical attempt to portray him as a.
“anonymous have even gone so far as to includea pic. ~ victim and his wife as a Persecuted inno-.
ad to put up “ture of the couple sitting on 4 ‘tree ‘cerit: bystander. Strange actions indeed ‘
“culate the first” stump, much like two children in love, © | for Anderson, who allegedly ran up uri
ton of “the “source of the $50,000.
_ Adkins, ‘according to’ our source, then.
a copy of the said that it was a loan from someone
wished to femain anonymous,
of Anderson’s ongoing defense of Sen:
and the special ublication of a
Williams, where
n .
tor
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Hub
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic