◆ SpookStack

ee ee nr Ce trensacted on a daily basts between the Bureau and the - _ sem eine nt Carn Soe an * eae tenant td inten gant . earthen Sar tne hanes tee see ne meinen 7t se . gee . oe To 8 THE DIREGYR QO or 1216-54 ‘om © Le 7. BOARDUAN yf Oe OED CEs Opt, omy i SUBJECT: . = . 20n Decétber 14, 1954, I sent you a note - tnd teating that Warren Olney had called me and commented he [naa @ couple of matters which "in the interests of harmony" he would like tu discuss with me so that "we won't get into a memo-wrtting contest." Ke stated he was too busy on December 15: to discuss thesé matters with me, but did come to my office at: 9230 AJWG, Decetder 16, 1954, and started his comments with aN observation that: he had Previously told you that when he became Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Criminal Division, he fotnd that there were many members in the Department who did not like the F3I and were endeavoring, when the cpportunt ty * e |presentes ttself, to put the FBI on the spot. He further stated. he that he had informed you that he intended to eradicate any on such feelings in the Department; that he intended that the Nw: Departmental Attorneys and the FEI representatives Junetion Ls on a very amicable basis and that he, Olney, has been fo, endeavoring to do that. He commented that quite a few of the aN People in the Department, Particulamdy in his Division, have bee movede JI advised Ouney that it had always been the desire of the FEI, and would continue to be the cestre of the F5I, Ez that_there be an amicable relationship be ween the representctives cf the Department and the Fifi; that in fact such aq relationships _ jwas essenticl to the proper consumnation of the effairs being 3 — aN ILED Department. Olney then commented that a menorandum had been received in connection with the case entitled, "Unknown | Subjects; United States vs. Umberto unastasio; Chstruction of y Justice." Olney: prefaced his renarks that he was not of the ffopinion that we should have conducted an inve- tigation of alleged jury tampering in the trial of Umberto Anastasio and thet he was, as a matter of fact, “writing a letter to United States Attorney Raymond Del Tufo, Jre, asking Jor. ‘ 'NRECORDED ° te é poe ‘ . 1j\felt there would be Justification Jor requesting investigation }jof jury tampering in instant case. He stated, however, that. 1h in our memorandum dated November 30, 1954,/a copy of which 7 2 attached for your infornztion, that there was a S tatenent Attachment ~ Ly . f te OSL eisss — yi’ Wee. One eee nmey, a (od