Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Peace And Disarmament Literature — Part 5
Page 61
61 / 171
“n
I a ca
ce Re EER PO EP erent Se
oe eee ee i
ee eee
)
The fact that Russia now has equal or better
weapons of extermination and has joined us in
these same insane preparations doubles our dan-
ger but does not halve our original guilt. Neither
does it nullify our willful stupidity in now clinging
to an obsolete, discredited strategy, based on a
negation of morality and a defiance of common
sense.
The only possible justification of our continued
reliance upon weapons of total extermination
would be that they do no present harm and would
never be used by cither side under any extremity
of provocation. Can any mature mind comfort
itself with either hope? Even our experimental
explosion of nuclear bombs, at a rate of more
than sun Pan Desanintes mee hae elena a mae Lan htnn?
MEGA LV BE ANUSSId OIL, bid> poisoned GUr DADDIES
milk, upset the delicate ecological balance of
Nature, and, still worse, defiled our genetic heri-
tage. As for the possibility that nuclear weapons
will never be used, our children in school know
better than this every time they are put through
the sadistic mummery of an air-raid drill and
learn to “play disaster.” Such baths of fear and
hostility are gratuitous assaults against the young,
whose psychological damage is already incalcul-
able; their only service is to bar more tightly the
exits that would permit a real escape.
There are people who would defend these plans
on the grounds that it is better to die nobly,
defending democracy and freedom, than to sur-
vive under Communist oppression, Such apolo-
gists perhaps exaggerate the differences that now
exist between our two systems, but they err even
more seriously in applying to mass extermination
a moral standard that was defensible only as long
as this death was a symbolic one confined to a
restricted number of people on a small portion
of the earth, Such a disaster, as in the bitter-end
resistance of the Southern Confederacy, was still
relatively minor and retrievable; if the original
resolve to die were in fact an erroneous onc, in a
few generations it could be corrected. Nuclear
damage, in contrast, is cumulative and irretriev-
able; it admits no belated confession of error, no
canentanses and aheolution
POP Cante aaa aoe,
Under what canon of sanity, then, can any
government, or any generation, with its limited
perspectives, its fallible judgment, its obvious
proneness to self-deception, delusion, and error,
make a decision for all future ages about the very
existence of even a single country? Still more,
how can any onc nation treat as a purely private
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic