Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 10
Page 26
26 / 140
; —— sna -itinathitinidhtenalc ttn iii Doniiniidinietiis satan
HISTORY GF UNITED STATES INVOLVEMENT IN VIETNAM | A3
not forget that it was the Vietminh regime, now ensconced in tke
North, that drove out the French; and many landless peasants
remembered that it was the Vietminh that had divided up the
estates of absentee landlords for their benefit.
By helping to establish a separate state south of the armistice
line, the United States was clearly acting m defiance of the Geneva
Accords. In effect, both the United States and Saigon accepted,
and insisted that Hanoi accept, only those aspects of the Geneva
; Agreements that they found advantageous and repudiated those
¢ . provisions that they regarded as contrary to their interests.
Thus, with American encouragement, Diem announced in
mid-1955 that the elections promised at Geneva would not
be held. Until 1958 the Hanoi government persisted in its
efforts to arrange for the promised elections, but Diem, consist-
ently backed by the United States, refused. During at least the
first three years of the post-Geneva period, there was a lull in the
military struggle, Hanoj refrained from support of insurrectionary
activity in the South. But by repudiating the heart of the Geneva
Agreements, Diem made civil war inevitable. When, in a civil
war, a military struggle for power ends on the agreed condition
that the competition will be transferred to the political level, the
side which repudiates the agreed conditions must expect that the
military struggle will be resumed.
Although American support was given to Diem, the United
States did not make a blank-check commitment to whatever regime
happened to hold power in Saigon. What has been referred to
as “the U.S. commitment” was a limited, qualified pledge of
economic support, and it was made specifically to Diem’s govern-
ment. It was not in any sense a pledge of military support. The
cornerstone of our Vietnam involvement, President Eisenhower's
letter to Diem in October 1954, was simply an undertaking “to
* ‘ examine” with Diem “how an intelligent prozram of American aid
given directly to your government can assist Vietnam .. . in
developing and maintaining a strong, viable state, capable of resist-
ro~. * fae . an Ing attempted subversion or aggression through military means.
me 7 A critica! liffcatian at even fe econqmir aid was te
ex se40(C« AA oritical qualification was that cven this economic aid was to be
\ ~ { subject to Dicm’s carrying through reforms responsive to the
vente
mtitepe Te
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic