Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 27
Page 8
8 / 108
ae
oY
‘ intensity of contamination from
To: Washington Field From: Washington viel
Re: 279A-WF-222936-USAMRIID, 05/24/2005
areas of the suite. Some of the positive cultures in the B3
Suite were emr+, while others tested erm-. The erm-resistant
(erm+) strain contamination followed[ | tracks in the
laboratory suite.*
Approximately 31 colonies of B.a. were cultured from
the handle of the B3 pass-box inside the suite.*® The colonies
derived from the pags- not tested for erythromycin
sensitivity because did not access the pass-box
on the day of the laboratory accident. An erm- result was
obtained for a colony from the B3 break room where the pass-box
was located, indicating that the contaminating_colony was not
associated with the April 8, 2002, accident.*® [ras
concerned that{ —_ ]founa contamination on the Tatch of the
pass-thru box, as the area was the point of entry and exit from
materials into and out of B3.*’ All areas with contamination
were cleaned with 20% bleach and were negative upon resurvey by
swab culture.
indicated that the level of contamination found
during survey of suite B3 was approximately the same as
present on many occasi en routine surveillance was performed
in the hot suite.*® Pee asvisea that[___]findings did not
appear out of the ordinary for a laboratory environment. Though
spores were located on the "hot-side" handle of the pass-thru
box, sampling inside the box was negative, which indicated to
[___ret a breach in containment from the "hot-side" to the
"cold-side" had not occurred. **®
Following the suite-wide sampling, held a
meeting with the [______]Pivision to advise of findings
and to notify personnel that "periodic sterility checks" would be
re-instituted immediately.*° According tol prior to the
April 8, 2002 incident, bacteriological monitoring of the BSL-3
was not conducted routinely.®* Until a number of years prior to
2002, weekly surveillance was performed. [~~ Jbelieved that
the practice stopped when anthrax research diminished and had not
been reinitiated on a regular basis.™
Contrary to[ __—_—sddvis felt that the total
Suite-wide survey was
greater than expected and also of special concern, since spores
were found on the inside pass-box latch, as well as on shoes and
articles of clothing in the hot-side change rooms. On Monday,
April 15, 2002, IVINS suggested to hat they also swab
parts of the cold-side for possible contamination. IVINS
suggested areas to sample, including his office, the cold-side of
the pass-thru_ box, and shower shoes in the cold-side men's change
room. [sid not understand why IVINS made this suggestion
a [
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic