◆ SpookStack

OF THE LOCAL OFFICE OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AR LECT A DISINTERESTED ARCHITE A LOCAL ARCHITECT PAGE TWO WAS SELECTED, AND AFTER GOING OVER PLANS, PHOTOGRAPHS, HEARING PREVIOUS TESTIMONY READ, AND HEARING SIX HOURS OF EVIDENCE ON SEPTEMBER TWELVE @MMMMMRGAVE HIS OPINION THAT THE PROJECT WAS ONE BUILDING. QB MADE His FINDING ON THIS QUESTION ON THE BASIS OMB oP iNton AND COULD NOT RECALL ANY TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES THAT INFLUENCED HIS DECISION IN THIS REGARD. RESPONDENTS ADMI CONSTRUCTION ON THE HOTEL PART WAS NO UNTIL APRIL, BUT a THAT IT WAS ONE BUILDING, AND THE TIME OF STARTING CONSTRUCTION ON ONE PART OF THAT BUILDING WAS NOT MATERIAL. pre THIRD, WHETHER THE BUILDING WAS OF THE SAME SIZE 9mm AND KIND AS THAT UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON MARCH TWENTY Six QM sTATED HIS QUESTION WAS INJECTEDWBY HIM AND NOTHING WAS INTRODUCED EITHER WAY AT THE FIRST HEARINGg HE STATES THAT IT SUBSEQUENTLY TEVELOPED THERE WERE TWO CHANGES IN THAT THE CONSTRUCTION STARTED QUT AS LATTIC FL AND WAS CHANGED TO REINFORCED CONCRETE _ WHICH THE COMMISSIONER FELT WAS A CHANGE FROM CRITICAL TO LESS CRITICAL MATERIAL, THERE WAS A CHANGE IN SIZE IN THAT THE BUILDING ACTUALLY BEING CONSTRUCTED WAS SOME SEVEN THOUSAND ae a nh eee ere et ere SQUARE FEET LESS THAN THAT SHOWN ON THE PLOT PLAN OF JANUARY Nees cen